A half-century ago, two men led a populist movement against the corrupt, pro-American government of Cuba. At the time, Cuba offered the United States everything that it commonly enjoys being offered; an exploitable work force, a friendly pro-corporate government, and sprawling resorts to play host to throngs of American tourists. Gambling was legal, the Mob was in heaven, what more could anyone ask for?
There was a time when Fidel Castro worked within the democratic framework in an attempt to end Cuban economic dependence on the United States and stop the rampant corruption that allowed American interests to bleed his nation. He was a member of the Partido Ortodoxos, and aided in the election efforts of Eduardo Chibás in the late 40’s. Of course, Chibás failed, and would eventually take his own life while on the radio during a second presidential campaign. Eventually, Fidel Castro, along with the Argentinean physician and Marxist, Ernesto Guevara, would resort to toppling the US backed government of Batista through force.
The Eisenhower administration, which had enjoyed success messing about in Latin America, began laying plans to remove Castro from power, which were inherited by the Kennedy administration. The attempted invasion of Cuba by US backed Cuban exiles ultimately failed, but it succeeded in showing the Cubans that without a significant deterrent it was perhaps only a matter of time before the United States employed its own forces to invade the country, or succeeded through the funding of paramilitaries. With a crippling economic embargo looming, Castro’s government turned to the Soviet Union, who seized the opportunity to introduce MRBM’s into the hemisphere. This move has traditionally been viewed as wholly aggressive on the part of the Soviets, something that I have always found bizarre being that, at the time, American missiles in Turkey could reach Moscow within 6 minutes.
In the end, the world was brought to the brink of nuclear war, in no small way because a pro-American puppet democracy was no longer in place in Havana.
Around here we’re taught otherwise. Around here, history books have painted devil horns on the likes of Fidel Castro, who, like so many others in his unenviable position, has been slowly transformed into that which he once worked to defeat. In the end, Dulles, Cabell, and Bissel ultimately triumphed, as they did elsewhere throughout the early, unchecked days of America’s fledgling post-war, neo-military establishment.
Around here we’re pro-democracy, pro-liberty, pro-self determination, pro-a lot of things. One thing that we most certainly are, though never prepared to actually admit it, is pro-bullshit. The President of the United States, like many before him, has pledged to help spread democracy to the four corners of the earth, and we, like air-headed cheerleaders, thrust our pom-poms skyward and scream jubilant paraphrases of inequity.
At Nuremburg, the only member of the Third Reich to admit his complicity in the genocidal undertakings of his government was Albert Speer, Hitler’s architect. And while Speer had nothing directly to do with the holocaust, he knew that because he had said and done nothing that he was just as guilty as those who had. And while the defeated are historically made to realize that the complicity of a people is entirely applicable to the success of those that commit acts of evil, those who blindly support those who get away with it are never placed in a position of being made to understand that their limited involvement in their own government processes significantly contributes to the quiet murders of hundreds of thousands of people. In the case of Nazi Germany, at least the German people could claim theirs was a fascism regime that would simply disappear those who dared speak out. The same cannot be said for the publics of Western democracies who boisterously support the basis on which their freedoms rest yet rarely do or say anything about the foreign actions of their governments that are entirely counter to those principles.
Hypocrisy and democracy are, in my opinion, synonymous. The plutocratic realities of government speaks volumes about the successful indoctrination of the public, be it now or a century ago. If might makes right, the surely right makes saints of killers and heroes of thieves.
Mexico is in the midst of a Presidential election. Right now, leftist Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador is seen as one of the front runners. It will be very interesting to see what happens if he wins. After all, Mexico is America’s playground.