<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Confessions Of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pitt</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8474</link>
		<dc:creator>pitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 12:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8474</guid>
		<description>the bad muslims.....

saying george carlin is better than black is like pointing out that the sky is blue...though carlin hit is stride and has since slowed down....except for Jersey Girl...that was art.

wow....

ummm Matt....it's been a while since i commented and far be it from me to say how the site should be run but out of curiosity - why are you entertaining this circus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the bad muslims&#8230;..</p>
<p>saying george carlin is better than black is like pointing out that the sky is blue&#8230;though carlin hit is stride and has since slowed down&#8230;.except for Jersey Girl&#8230;that was art.</p>
<p>wow&#8230;.</p>
<p>ummm Matt&#8230;.it&#8217;s been a while since i commented and far be it from me to say how the site should be run but out of curiosity - why are you entertaining this circus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RP</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8472</link>
		<dc:creator>RP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 07:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8472</guid>
		<description>And of course the backdrop to what may or may not be reliable information is that fact that Mr. Mohammed did not give up this information because his interrogators kept saying "Please" for 4 years. Surely another reason his confession is being paraded out in public - in violation of the norms of warfare which are to spare prisoners of war 'public humiliation',  and isn't it the Bush Administration that keeps on insisting this is a "WAR"? - is to set the next stage in their erosion of the thresholds against torture. "See,"  the apologists of that which they say they are fighting against will now say, "our methods are vital - we've got the number one operational mastermind of Al Qaeda to tell all". Sure, after the kind of stress on the human constitution that has likely reduced him to the other side of sanity. And did it save lives? The capture, simply, has undoubtedly. But the torture? Not likely. All of the souls tortured by regimes to date that have used the rationale of necessity (to save lives) no doubt outnumber the numbers actually saved, likely by great orders of magnitude. Any real such numbers we can never know, but the 'ticking time bomb' scenario works its wonders, including the wonder that few seem to reflect that justifications for torture are always about the 'foreign' terrorist, for whom it is deemed acceptable in mainstream US discourse now to do what it takes to get information and save lives. But do they reflect upon whether they would themselves want to retain the protection of being innocent until proven guilty? Do any of them say of an American citizen arrested on suspicion of terrorism, "well, torture him and see what we get out of him?"  "But this is war" is the response. Well, guess what? The laws of war presume that prisoners have useful information - in fact, we all KNOW they do. Any soldier could at the minimum say where his regiment might be attacking next. And guess what? The rules of war still forbid the torturing of prisoners, let alone mistreatment. Thus the Bush Administration's attempt to define those it captures as neither prisoners of war, nor criminals entitled to due process - they are, in short, defined out of human existence. With no body of law that thus need apply. Would that they could get away with such lawlessness in pursuit of the rest of their agenda, not that they haven't had disturbing successes no one could have dreamed they would have gotten away with but 6 years ago, from outing their own spies (traitors) to spying on their own people in the most brazen violation of a clear law one could limagine. Quite a sight to watch the devolution of the world's most powerful democracy into nothing less than authoritarianism. At the least, you'd think the Republicans would be smart enough not to set up an absolutist presidency that could be turned over to Hilary or that other fella they're not exactly going to be wanting in office. Stay tuned....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course the backdrop to what may or may not be reliable information is that fact that Mr. Mohammed did not give up this information because his interrogators kept saying &#8220;Please&#8221; for 4 years. Surely another reason his confession is being paraded out in public - in violation of the norms of warfare which are to spare prisoners of war &#8216;public humiliation&#8217;,  and isn&#8217;t it the Bush Administration that keeps on insisting this is a &#8220;WAR&#8221;? - is to set the next stage in their erosion of the thresholds against torture. &#8220;See,&#8221;  the apologists of that which they say they are fighting against will now say, &#8220;our methods are vital - we&#8217;ve got the number one operational mastermind of Al Qaeda to tell all&#8221;. Sure, after the kind of stress on the human constitution that has likely reduced him to the other side of sanity. And did it save lives? The capture, simply, has undoubtedly. But the torture? Not likely. All of the souls tortured by regimes to date that have used the rationale of necessity (to save lives) no doubt outnumber the numbers actually saved, likely by great orders of magnitude. Any real such numbers we can never know, but the &#8216;ticking time bomb&#8217; scenario works its wonders, including the wonder that few seem to reflect that justifications for torture are always about the &#8216;foreign&#8217; terrorist, for whom it is deemed acceptable in mainstream US discourse now to do what it takes to get information and save lives. But do they reflect upon whether they would themselves want to retain the protection of being innocent until proven guilty? Do any of them say of an American citizen arrested on suspicion of terrorism, &#8220;well, torture him and see what we get out of him?&#8221;  &#8220;But this is war&#8221; is the response. Well, guess what? The laws of war presume that prisoners have useful information - in fact, we all KNOW they do. Any soldier could at the minimum say where his regiment might be attacking next. And guess what? The rules of war still forbid the torturing of prisoners, let alone mistreatment. Thus the Bush Administration&#8217;s attempt to define those it captures as neither prisoners of war, nor criminals entitled to due process - they are, in short, defined out of human existence. With no body of law that thus need apply. Would that they could get away with such lawlessness in pursuit of the rest of their agenda, not that they haven&#8217;t had disturbing successes no one could have dreamed they would have gotten away with but 6 years ago, from outing their own spies (traitors) to spying on their own people in the most brazen violation of a clear law one could limagine. Quite a sight to watch the devolution of the world&#8217;s most powerful democracy into nothing less than authoritarianism. At the least, you&#8217;d think the Republicans would be smart enough not to set up an absolutist presidency that could be turned over to Hilary or that other fella they&#8217;re not exactly going to be wanting in office. Stay tuned&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raoul duke</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8452</link>
		<dc:creator>raoul duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8452</guid>
		<description>Did I say North Americas would be safer under Hilary? Did I say I've got all the answers? Did you post a definitive statement saying "because they are weak on defense"? That to me sounds like someone who thinks they know it all and can't tell the difference between bloated rhetorical spin and hard facts. 

Believe what you want pal, it's your life, not mine. George Bush and his crew have kept no safer than than you were before 2000, in fact your NOT as safe as you were. But believe everything they tell you.

As to the the Lewis Black/Carlin comparison, like I care what you think. Carlin makes most stand-ups look like their standing still. Thanks for your news flash though. Now, back to your unquestioning patriotism.

Now, please explain how 9/11 happened while Bush was protecting you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I say North Americas would be safer under Hilary? Did I say I&#8217;ve got all the answers? Did you post a definitive statement saying &#8220;because they are weak on defense&#8221;? That to me sounds like someone who thinks they know it all and can&#8217;t tell the difference between bloated rhetorical spin and hard facts. </p>
<p>Believe what you want pal, it&#8217;s your life, not mine. George Bush and his crew have kept no safer than than you were before 2000, in fact your NOT as safe as you were. But believe everything they tell you.</p>
<p>As to the the Lewis Black/Carlin comparison, like I care what you think. Carlin makes most stand-ups look like their standing still. Thanks for your news flash though. Now, back to your unquestioning patriotism.</p>
<p>Now, please explain how 9/11 happened while Bush was protecting you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyHaven</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8450</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyHaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8450</guid>
		<description>Raoul:

Thanks for keeping your composure buddy, but to answer your question; no I'm not retarded.

But it sure seems like you know all the answers and no doubt some of our Country's greatest minds are sub-par comedians who's only gimmick is wagging his stupid finger like Lewis Black (George Carlin makes Black look like the retard).  So why don't you go ahead and explain why North Amercia and the rest of the world is going to be a safer place with Hilary Clinton as President.  Take your time pal.  No rush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raoul:</p>
<p>Thanks for keeping your composure buddy, but to answer your question; no I&#8217;m not retarded.</p>
<p>But it sure seems like you know all the answers and no doubt some of our Country&#8217;s greatest minds are sub-par comedians who&#8217;s only gimmick is wagging his stupid finger like Lewis Black (George Carlin makes Black look like the retard).  So why don&#8217;t you go ahead and explain why North Amercia and the rest of the world is going to be a safer place with Hilary Clinton as President.  Take your time pal.  No rush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raoul duke</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8441</link>
		<dc:creator>raoul duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8441</guid>
		<description>@ BobbyHaven
"because they are weak on defense and the bad muslims are gonna have an easier time killing us"

To quote Lewis Black: Are you fucking RETARDED????

Weak on defense? And your empirical data on this was from a double-blind sample right? Please, enough of staid rhetoric. It's old and tired and doesn't stand up under scrutiny. Always remember, on Sept 11,2001 GEORGE BUSH was the President. Wow, he really protected you that day. Maybe if he hadn't of ignored Richard Clarke's warning, or better yet, wasn't on vacation for most of the first 9 month's of his Presidency, MAYBE, just MAYBE, it wouldn't of happened!

Congratulations, your an unquestioning patriot, democracy's greatest enemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ BobbyHaven<br />
&#8220;because they are weak on defense and the bad muslims are gonna have an easier time killing us&#8221;</p>
<p>To quote Lewis Black: Are you fucking RETARDED????</p>
<p>Weak on defense? And your empirical data on this was from a double-blind sample right? Please, enough of staid rhetoric. It&#8217;s old and tired and doesn&#8217;t stand up under scrutiny. Always remember, on Sept 11,2001 GEORGE BUSH was the President. Wow, he really protected you that day. Maybe if he hadn&#8217;t of ignored Richard Clarke&#8217;s warning, or better yet, wasn&#8217;t on vacation for most of the first 9 month&#8217;s of his Presidency, MAYBE, just MAYBE, it wouldn&#8217;t of happened!</p>
<p>Congratulations, your an unquestioning patriot, democracy&#8217;s greatest enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfrider</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8435</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8435</guid>
		<description>@ BobbyHaven

I don't want to start a flame war here, but there's no way that post was real. People like that don't really exist. Did you just say "bad muslims"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ BobbyHaven</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to start a flame war here, but there&#8217;s no way that post was real. People like that don&#8217;t really exist. Did you just say &#8220;bad muslims&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raoul duke</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8421</link>
		<dc:creator>raoul duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8421</guid>
		<description>You may want to read this:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20070315/terrorist-plots

okgirls2003:
Here's one for you: All governments lie to their populace. It's a fact. So to say what they do is "horseshit" shows your naivette. How do you know it's horseshit? The answer is you don't, your just assuming. And Always remeber, when they start rounding up the undesireables for treason in facsist states, they always kill the political dissidents and academics first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to read this:<br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20070315/terrorist-plots" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20070315/terrorist-plots</a></p>
<p>okgirls2003:<br />
Here&#8217;s one for you: All governments lie to their populace. It&#8217;s a fact. So to say what they do is &#8220;horseshit&#8221; shows your naivette. How do you know it&#8217;s horseshit? The answer is you don&#8217;t, your just assuming. And Always remeber, when they start rounding up the undesireables for treason in facsist states, they always kill the political dissidents and academics first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Lilly</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8415</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Lilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8415</guid>
		<description>Hippies and bad muslims. those guys is ruining everything! It's just a shame that nobody told anybody in the Bush administration that people who Bobby refers to as bad muslims were intent on attacking the U.S. before they actually did.

wait,

my bad.

Somebody DID tell them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hippies and bad muslims. those guys is ruining everything! It&#8217;s just a shame that nobody told anybody in the Bush administration that people who Bobby refers to as bad muslims were intent on attacking the U.S. before they actually did.</p>
<p>wait,</p>
<p>my bad.</p>
<p>Somebody DID tell them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyHaven</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8406</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyHaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8406</guid>
		<description>If you seriously want me to tell you why America is the greatest country in the world, I will.  It would just take me a long time to write all the reasons so I won't for now.  I was, in my own way commenting directly to your opinion of the Khalid Sheek Mohomod case, but I don't care about that right now so I won't comment any further.  I just would like to say that neither the demoncrats nor the green party are the answer because they are weak on defense and the bad muslims are gonna have an easier time killing us (oh yeah, I forgot to mention that the bad ones hate Canada too).  I have read a lot of stuff on this site and it seems like bitchin and complaining about Bush and the Americans is all you hippies like to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you seriously want me to tell you why America is the greatest country in the world, I will.  It would just take me a long time to write all the reasons so I won&#8217;t for now.  I was, in my own way commenting directly to your opinion of the Khalid Sheek Mohomod case, but I don&#8217;t care about that right now so I won&#8217;t comment any further.  I just would like to say that neither the demoncrats nor the green party are the answer because they are weak on defense and the bad muslims are gonna have an easier time killing us (oh yeah, I forgot to mention that the bad ones hate Canada too).  I have read a lot of stuff on this site and it seems like bitchin and complaining about Bush and the Americans is all you hippies like to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Mugford</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8397</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Mugford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8397</guid>
		<description>Look what we got him to admit to after four years of sheer inhuman torture and the drought of his soul!

&lt;em&gt;It must be true.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look what we got him to admit to after four years of sheer inhuman torture and the drought of his soul!</p>
<p><em>It must be true.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bullwinkle</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8393</link>
		<dc:creator>bullwinkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8393</guid>
		<description>If the Americans were so sure their accusations were legit, the actual confession would have been open to media, and they would've had a chance to get some legitimacy back into their administration... but a transcript from some guy with nothing to lose is all they could cough up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Americans were so sure their accusations were legit, the actual confession would have been open to media, and they would&#8217;ve had a chance to get some legitimacy back into their administration&#8230; but a transcript from some guy with nothing to lose is all they could cough up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfile2</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8392</link>
		<dc:creator>cfile2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8392</guid>
		<description>Sonny,

    To add to that, I'm a psychology major and I've done some extensive reading on false confessions and manufactured memories. It can take just 8 hours of intense interrogation to get someone to produce a false confession to a crime of murder. Imagine: what confessions can one get from someone through water-boarding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonny,</p>
<p>    To add to that, I&#8217;m a psychology major and I&#8217;ve done some extensive reading on false confessions and manufactured memories. It can take just 8 hours of intense interrogation to get someone to produce a false confession to a crime of murder. Imagine: what confessions can one get from someone through water-boarding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Good</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8391</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8391</guid>
		<description>How does one define corruption in this sense? Is it better to be overt about oneâ€™s corruption, such as &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6454827.stm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Robert Mugabe&lt;/a&gt; is, or is it better to lie a population into an illegal war while using human rights as justification for removing a despot while employing stratagems in an ambiguous global war that causes a global decline in human rights and an increase in arms proliferation, preemption, and unilateralism? 

Can corruption be defined by Israelâ€™s refusal to admit that it even has a nuclear program, or allow the UN to investigate that possibility, when it and others demand that Iran must be stopped at all costs and use the UN to do their bidding when Palestinians have absolutely no ability to use the UN for purposes of aiding their struggle?

China has for decades occupied Tibet, Russia is still in the Caucasus, where it points to American actions in the war on terror as justification for its policies in Chechnya and elsewhere in the region, the government in Khartoum remains in power and supports the Janjiweed militias primarily because they control the oil and China is their biggest customer, Somalia has seen US influence return to support those they once combated a decade ago while they use the Ethiopians as proxies and get to sell some weapons on the side, the US trades nuclear technology with India, who has the bomb, and who has also not ratified the NPT, while Iran has ratified the NPT but is denied the right to nuclear energy. The contradictions and corruptions are countless. The point is, who has the power to ultimately influence, to take the lead in altering the trend? 

Abraham Lincoln once wrote that he would rather move to Russia where despotism wasnâ€™t concealed rather than live with democratic hypocrisy. He was the first Republican president of the United States. What the hell has happened since is anyoneâ€™s guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does one define corruption in this sense? Is it better to be overt about oneâ€™s corruption, such as <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6454827.stm" rel="nofollow">Robert Mugabe</a> is, or is it better to lie a population into an illegal war while using human rights as justification for removing a despot while employing stratagems in an ambiguous global war that causes a global decline in human rights and an increase in arms proliferation, preemption, and unilateralism? </p>
<p>Can corruption be defined by Israelâ€™s refusal to admit that it even has a nuclear program, or allow the UN to investigate that possibility, when it and others demand that Iran must be stopped at all costs and use the UN to do their bidding when Palestinians have absolutely no ability to use the UN for purposes of aiding their struggle?</p>
<p>China has for decades occupied Tibet, Russia is still in the Caucasus, where it points to American actions in the war on terror as justification for its policies in Chechnya and elsewhere in the region, the government in Khartoum remains in power and supports the Janjiweed militias primarily because they control the oil and China is their biggest customer, Somalia has seen US influence return to support those they once combated a decade ago while they use the Ethiopians as proxies and get to sell some weapons on the side, the US trades nuclear technology with India, who has the bomb, and who has also not ratified the NPT, while Iran has ratified the NPT but is denied the right to nuclear energy. The contradictions and corruptions are countless. The point is, who has the power to ultimately influence, to take the lead in altering the trend? </p>
<p>Abraham Lincoln once wrote that he would rather move to Russia where despotism wasnâ€™t concealed rather than live with democratic hypocrisy. He was the first Republican president of the United States. What the hell has happened since is anyoneâ€™s guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonny Parlin</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8390</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonny Parlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8390</guid>
		<description>"According to the sources, CIA officers who subjected themselves to the water boarding technique lasted an average of 14 seconds before caving in. They said al Qaeda's toughest prisoner, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, won the admiration of interrogators when he was able to last between two and two-and-a-half minutes before begging to confess."

Source: http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Investigation/story?id=1322866</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;According to the sources, CIA officers who subjected themselves to the water boarding technique lasted an average of 14 seconds before caving in. They said al Qaeda&#8217;s toughest prisoner, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, won the admiration of interrogators when he was able to last between two and two-and-a-half minutes before begging to confess.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Investigation/story?id=1322866" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Investigation/story?id=1322866</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfile2</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8389</link>
		<dc:creator>cfile2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8389</guid>
		<description>Mr. cfile2. 

Matt, you pretty much said what needed to be said but I have 2 things to add: 

1) I am not Matt's yes man I just happen to share many of his views on issues of the day 

2) Why shouldn't we be picking on the biggest bully? There are many sides to the war going on right now and the human rights violations of all nations involved have been addressed on this site. The U.S has made repeated claims that it is the greatest nation on earth and that everybody looks up to them. If that is true, then any corruption and any human rights violations that take place within thier government are particularly harmful. Is this what we are meant to look up to? A nation that laughs in the face of the Geneva conventions and resorts to water boarding as an acceptable tactic? I'd liken that to the boy who has a wife beating father as a role model.
As I said before, if our leaders start pursuing their own interests, and not the interests of their nations and of our global community, democracy fails and we are left with little more than suspicion and bitterness and a world full of people with nothing but contempt. The U.S needs to check itself and perhaps instead of pursuing the goal of being the greatest nation on earth, we can all work together and form a global community that is based on mutual respect for our differences. Forgive me for being hippy with a pipe dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. cfile2. </p>
<p>Matt, you pretty much said what needed to be said but I have 2 things to add: </p>
<p>1) I am not Matt&#8217;s yes man I just happen to share many of his views on issues of the day </p>
<p>2) Why shouldn&#8217;t we be picking on the biggest bully? There are many sides to the war going on right now and the human rights violations of all nations involved have been addressed on this site. The U.S has made repeated claims that it is the greatest nation on earth and that everybody looks up to them. If that is true, then any corruption and any human rights violations that take place within thier government are particularly harmful. Is this what we are meant to look up to? A nation that laughs in the face of the Geneva conventions and resorts to water boarding as an acceptable tactic? I&#8217;d liken that to the boy who has a wife beating father as a role model.<br />
As I said before, if our leaders start pursuing their own interests, and not the interests of their nations and of our global community, democracy fails and we are left with little more than suspicion and bitterness and a world full of people with nothing but contempt. The U.S needs to check itself and perhaps instead of pursuing the goal of being the greatest nation on earth, we can all work together and form a global community that is based on mutual respect for our differences. Forgive me for being hippy with a pipe dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: okgirls2003</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8388</link>
		<dc:creator>okgirls2003</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8388</guid>
		<description>OK OK OK....I think I have heard everything!!!  I think that the US government may not be the most corrupt government in the world, but its in the top 3 (Russia, China, USA)  You make the call on where it rates.  

I will say this as well....What the US Government tells the population of the world in newspaper, broadcasts, bulletins etc etc, is one thing, but what they are actually doing behind the scenes is another.  They want us to think they are doing things for the greater good, but in reality it's all a bunch of horse shit!  

Not one country is perfect or better than the next, but they deceive us with lies.  MattGood.org is a place for people like myself to express our frustrations, and to let others know, that there are alot of people thinking the very same thing.  No, as a group we can't "defeat" the "bully" but it takes one voice.  Here we are voicing our opinions, "we won't stand for the crap that is being handed to us"  We need to stand up and at least be heard.  

One more thing, if we don't do anything, then we can only blame ourselves for how bad its going to get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK OK OK&#8230;.I think I have heard everything!!!  I think that the US government may not be the most corrupt government in the world, but its in the top 3 (Russia, China, USA)  You make the call on where it rates.  </p>
<p>I will say this as well&#8230;.What the US Government tells the population of the world in newspaper, broadcasts, bulletins etc etc, is one thing, but what they are actually doing behind the scenes is another.  They want us to think they are doing things for the greater good, but in reality it&#8217;s all a bunch of horse shit!  </p>
<p>Not one country is perfect or better than the next, but they deceive us with lies.  MattGood.org is a place for people like myself to express our frustrations, and to let others know, that there are alot of people thinking the very same thing.  No, as a group we can&#8217;t &#8220;defeat&#8221; the &#8220;bully&#8221; but it takes one voice.  Here we are voicing our opinions, &#8220;we won&#8217;t stand for the crap that is being handed to us&#8221;  We need to stand up and at least be heard.  </p>
<p>One more thing, if we don&#8217;t do anything, then we can only blame ourselves for how bad its going to get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonsil_hockee</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8387</link>
		<dc:creator>tonsil_hockee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8387</guid>
		<description>I wonder if he shot and killed Pat Tillman too? Oh wait, we got 3 or 4 answers on that little incident already, my bad. I can't believe he left out confessing to Hurricane Katrina and the earthquake/ Tsunami on Christ's birthday. Man, that's worth at least 73 virgins. And what about hiding Bin Laden in the Border Mickey'D's in Pakistan?
One guy is doing all of this? ok, thanks Dubya...nice try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if he shot and killed Pat Tillman too? Oh wait, we got 3 or 4 answers on that little incident already, my bad. I can&#8217;t believe he left out confessing to Hurricane Katrina and the earthquake/ Tsunami on Christ&#8217;s birthday. Man, that&#8217;s worth at least 73 virgins. And what about hiding Bin Laden in the Border Mickey&#8217;D&#8217;s in Pakistan?<br />
One guy is doing all of this? ok, thanks Dubya&#8230;nice try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Good</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8386</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8386</guid>
		<description>Is that all you have as an argument, that solutions are not offered? Have you read this blog for a long time, checked itâ€™s archives before making that claim? Have you any real, substantial knowledge of US covert and foreign policy history? What leads you to automatically assume that the United States is the greatest country in the world? You can employ terms such as â€œhippiesâ€? if you prefer, if it justifies your position to you. You can also claim that the people that comment here are little more than yes men, which, in a far greater context, means that hundreds of millions of others that share the same point of view must be as well. So what is it to be? If youâ€™d care to comment on this entry, on the detainment of individuals held in legal limbo and in conditions that every human rights organization on the planet, including the UNHRC, has complained about, then do so. If you are unable to do so, then what is the point of even commenting if it is simply to accuse me of disliking something that, in fact, claims to be against the very same things in principle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that all you have as an argument, that solutions are not offered? Have you read this blog for a long time, checked itâ€™s archives before making that claim? Have you any real, substantial knowledge of US covert and foreign policy history? What leads you to automatically assume that the United States is the greatest country in the world? You can employ terms such as â€œhippiesâ€? if you prefer, if it justifies your position to you. You can also claim that the people that comment here are little more than yes men, which, in a far greater context, means that hundreds of millions of others that share the same point of view must be as well. So what is it to be? If youâ€™d care to comment on this entry, on the detainment of individuals held in legal limbo and in conditions that every human rights organization on the planet, including the UNHRC, has complained about, then do so. If you are unable to do so, then what is the point of even commenting if it is simply to accuse me of disliking something that, in fact, claims to be against the very same things in principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyHaven</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8385</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyHaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8385</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the response I received from Mr. or Mrs. "cfile2".  When someone responds by putting forth a strong and valid argument, rather than insulting me and insinuating that I might be the father of Anna Nicole Smith's baby, I always appreciate it.  
I just feel that all human beings are capable and highly likely to use power for selfish means, as the U.S. Government has clearly been doing.  I just don't see hope in the "hippy protestors" to save the day, and with all due respect to Matt Good (as he is a smart guy and a terrific musician), I just see this site as another means of ineffective "hippy protest".
I'm not saying that I have all the answers, but I just don't think that picking on the biggest bully is the right way to solve the many problems we have in this world.  America is the biggest and toughest bully there is, but I don't think it's the worst.  I also think America IS the greatest country in the world and I have many reasons to believe that to be so.  I know I'm probably the only member of this site to believe this (as most seem to be Matt's "yes men") but I hope that doesn't call for childish name-calling or the insulting of my intelligence.  There should be more people like Mr. or Mrs. "cfile2".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the response I received from Mr. or Mrs. &#8220;cfile2&#8243;.  When someone responds by putting forth a strong and valid argument, rather than insulting me and insinuating that I might be the father of Anna Nicole Smith&#8217;s baby, I always appreciate it.<br />
I just feel that all human beings are capable and highly likely to use power for selfish means, as the U.S. Government has clearly been doing.  I just don&#8217;t see hope in the &#8220;hippy protestors&#8221; to save the day, and with all due respect to Matt Good (as he is a smart guy and a terrific musician), I just see this site as another means of ineffective &#8220;hippy protest&#8221;.<br />
I&#8217;m not saying that I have all the answers, but I just don&#8217;t think that picking on the biggest bully is the right way to solve the many problems we have in this world.  America is the biggest and toughest bully there is, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the worst.  I also think America IS the greatest country in the world and I have many reasons to believe that to be so.  I know I&#8217;m probably the only member of this site to believe this (as most seem to be Matt&#8217;s &#8220;yes men&#8221;) but I hope that doesn&#8217;t call for childish name-calling or the insulting of my intelligence.  There should be more people like Mr. or Mrs. &#8220;cfile2&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfile2</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8382</link>
		<dc:creator>cfile2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/2007/03/the-confessions-of-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/#comment-8382</guid>
		<description>"in the words of the Saddam Hussienâ€™s character in South Park; â€œRelax man, take a restâ€?. You seriously need to take a rest from your persoanl war on the U.S. Government. Wake up dude, every government is corrupt to a certain degree, and if you look at the situation objectively you can easily see that the U.S. government is one of the LEAST corrupt governments in the world" 

Bobby: An interesting thing about the statement you've made is, I think, that it is a commonly held opinion among many. I've heard it countless times that "sure governements are corrupt, but hey, at least we aren't THAT bad". Corruption in the government is absolutely intolerable to any degree. We can not allow corruption to become the status quo, because when there is corruption, democracy fails by default because those meant to be leading us begin leading their own interests. I think you'd be shocked to find exactly how corrupt the U.S government is. Anytime anything in this war has gone wrong not a single person has stepped up to take full accountability for it. Not Rumsfeld, not Cheney, not Bush or anybody else in his administration. It is always pawned off on some subordinate and its truly pathetic that we allow it to continue. The fact that the military commissions act was ever allowed to be thought of let alone drafted and written to law is a testament to how corrupt the government is. They have stripped the rights of their people entirely. Least corrupt indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;in the words of the Saddam Hussienâ€™s character in South Park; â€œRelax man, take a restâ€?. You seriously need to take a rest from your persoanl war on the U.S. Government. Wake up dude, every government is corrupt to a certain degree, and if you look at the situation objectively you can easily see that the U.S. government is one of the LEAST corrupt governments in the world&#8221; </p>
<p>Bobby: An interesting thing about the statement you&#8217;ve made is, I think, that it is a commonly held opinion among many. I&#8217;ve heard it countless times that &#8220;sure governements are corrupt, but hey, at least we aren&#8217;t THAT bad&#8221;. Corruption in the government is absolutely intolerable to any degree. We can not allow corruption to become the status quo, because when there is corruption, democracy fails by default because those meant to be leading us begin leading their own interests. I think you&#8217;d be shocked to find exactly how corrupt the U.S government is. Anytime anything in this war has gone wrong not a single person has stepped up to take full accountability for it. Not Rumsfeld, not Cheney, not Bush or anybody else in his administration. It is always pawned off on some subordinate and its truly pathetic that we allow it to continue. The fact that the military commissions act was ever allowed to be thought of let alone drafted and written to law is a testament to how corrupt the government is. They have stripped the rights of their people entirely. Least corrupt indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
