A Last Minute Deflection

If one needs proof that the government isn’t in a state of panic over what has occurred in Afghanistan regarding the transfer of detainees to Afghan authorities known for their use of torture, one need look no further than the events surrounding the legal battle taking place here at home about the issue.

It began with Amnesty International and the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association launching a legal effort to obtain an injunction which would require an immediate discontinuation of the transfer of detainees from Canadian forces to Afghan authorities until a legal case regarding the matter could be heard. The government’s reaction was to call the allegations of torture based on ‘hearsay’ in a 32 page brief written on the subject, thus challenging the validity of the initial story by The Globe’s Graeme Smith who based his piece on interviews with some thirty detainees that had claimed to have be tortured by Afghan authorities after being handed over to them by the Canadian military. The government also claimed in the same brief that Smith’s piece should not be admissible as evidence.

Beyond that, the government also went to lengths to suggest that to discontinue the transfer of prisoners would put Canadians in the field at greater risk, and that those who had been interviewed could have simply fabricated their stories for purposes of propaganda.

And then today, out of nowhere, the government announced that a new deal had been reached with the Afghan government which would allow Canadians access to those detainees transferred to Afghan custody, the timing of which is suspicious to say the least.

Amnesty International’s response to the new agreement was, in my opinion, concise and accurate…

“You don’t prevent torture in a country where it is rampant and systematic, as it is in Afghanistan, by sending in monitors on an occasional basis. It simply doesn’t work,” Alex Neve, spokesman for Amnesty in Canada, told Reuters.”

The suspicious timing of the announcement of the new agreement was also brought up in the House today…

“This agreement was conveniently signed just hours before the start of the federal court proceedings this morning,” said Liberal MP Ujjal Dosanjh. “Even the judge is said to have remarked on the curious timing on this particular agreement.

“Did the foreign affairs minister push forward the signing of this critical international agreement in order to save this government from a public embarrassment before our courts?”

Foreign Affairs Minister Peter MacKay shot back by saying…

“We’ve worked actually very quickly. When the issues came forward we took action to enhance the agreement.”

It’s well known what goes on in Afghan jails, and to feign that the use of such tactics for purposes of gaining intelligence isn’t a known reality is simply ludicrous. That, in the end, is really what all this is about. We just happened to get caught with our hand the coookie jar.



Want to bookmark or share this entry?



This entry was posted on Friday, May 4th, 2007 at 12:24 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.



5 Comments

  1. Travis Reitsma Says:

    Another thing that suggests that the Canadian government isn’t taking this seriously? Shane fucking Doan. Now don’t get me wrong, French Canadians have been unfairly treated over history and still are today, but COME ON. This issue was resolved TWO YEARS AGO by the NHL. If you don’t know what I’m referring to here it is. This whole thing is nothing more than a tactic to win French-Canadian support and quite frankly is an embarrassment to the purposes of our government and a waste of our tax money.

    Instead of focusing on the plethora or meaningful issues at hand, we choose to focus on this bollucks. Things like prisoner treatment in Afghanistan get lost in the media spectacle that is the Shane Doan issue. ERG

  2. J. Canuck Says:

    Ah, the joys of a government in panic mode. It’s an improvement over the previous agreement, but still very far from any reasonable facsimile of ideal.

  3. gorram_feds Says:

    Thank you Matt for continuing to keep this story top-of-mind, as it appears to be falling off the radar of most Canadian news organizations (big surprise - ‘oh, a new agreement’s signed, problem solved!’); your work is appreciated. It is now up to us to keep this story in the news and to make sure it continues to matter; our inept and corrupt *minority* government (”Canada’s New Government” ? - please!) must not be let off the hook.

  4. DudeLove721 Says:

    Travis, I totally agree about Shane Doane. There was never enough evidence to punish him for allegedly making those comments two years ago and if even if there was… the ruling was handed down two years ago… getting the government involved is just ridiculous. They’re going to pull funding if he’s captain? Give me a break…

    I guess when there’s an easy opprtunity to make it seem like they care the government will always take it: Afghanistan and french-Canadians included.

  5. michaelavlewis Says:

    Yeah. Shane Doane should be left alone. Two years… gees people never let go. He said something offensive to someone else. Where I come from, you either get a dirty look, a slap in the face, or it just gets ignored all together.
    Anyway.

    Well, the good thing about the panic mode is that government makes quick actions. The bad thing is that those actions should have taken place to begin with. Government shouldn’t try to shhh everything that may make them look bad. Look at the sponsorship scandal and how that just blew up everywhere.

    Give the grease to the squeeky wheel. Don’t wait til it jams up and falls off.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.




By registering to comment you agree to adhere to website policies.