<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CDS General Rick Hillier Retires</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Agent-K</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/#comment-50257</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent-K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=2416#comment-50257</guid>
		<description>Don't get me wrong.  I couldn't agree more with regards to the state of affairs the CF found itself in under the tenure of the liberials.  It was our own government that set the conditions for budget cuts, and not our involvement with UN (or other) peacekeeping operations.  I view the liberals as being chiefly responsible for the misappropriation of the 'peacekeeping' image and promoting peacekeeping operations as being something akin too, but not quiet like, policing.  By presenting a watered down and erroneous image of what peacekeeping is to the public, they could then justify decreases in military spending under their leadership.  Why does the CF need a new fleet of helicopters if their use in peacekeeping operations is limited to secondary and non-combat roles, and if CF deployments are primarily in support of UN peacekeeping operations, right?  While something of an over simplified statement on the subject, this is how I've always understood the liberal train of thought from that period when it came to military spending (and one I disagree with).

Likewise, I think that your point about our getting away from the 'peacekeeper training' has stalled progress in Kandahar is very poignant.  The last thing we should be doing is getting away from this sort of training.  I believe soldiers to be the front line of diplomacy in areas of conflict, and they should be provided the training and skills to act as diplomats in situations that demand it.  As the representatives of our nation in the field the CF can set the tone for how our intentions as a nation are perceived by those we are there to help.  To ensure the right tone is set with the local populace our soldiers should be equally schooled in the arts of diplomacy as well as those of war, no matter the type of operation they are engaged in.  When it comes to operations centred around the concept of 'winning hearts and minds', as we seem to be repeatedly told about those in Kandahar, this becomes all the more important.

As to the image of the CF... that's a hard question to respond to and gives me pause for thought.  In my eagerness to see the CF move away from a public image that I view as having allowed for the neglect it saw under the liberals I realize I probably threw the baby out with the bath water.  That is to say, instead of moving away from the peacekeeper image, perhaps we should look at refining it so that it accurately presents and represents the Canadian Forces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong.  I couldn&#8217;t agree more with regards to the state of affairs the CF found itself in under the tenure of the liberials.  It was our own government that set the conditions for budget cuts, and not our involvement with UN (or other) peacekeeping operations.  I view the liberals as being chiefly responsible for the misappropriation of the &#8216;peacekeeping&#8217; image and promoting peacekeeping operations as being something akin too, but not quiet like, policing.  By presenting a watered down and erroneous image of what peacekeeping is to the public, they could then justify decreases in military spending under their leadership.  Why does the CF need a new fleet of helicopters if their use in peacekeeping operations is limited to secondary and non-combat roles, and if CF deployments are primarily in support of UN peacekeeping operations, right?  While something of an over simplified statement on the subject, this is how I&#8217;ve always understood the liberal train of thought from that period when it came to military spending (and one I disagree with).</p>
<p>Likewise, I think that your point about our getting away from the &#8216;peacekeeper training&#8217; has stalled progress in Kandahar is very poignant.  The last thing we should be doing is getting away from this sort of training.  I believe soldiers to be the front line of diplomacy in areas of conflict, and they should be provided the training and skills to act as diplomats in situations that demand it.  As the representatives of our nation in the field the CF can set the tone for how our intentions as a nation are perceived by those we are there to help.  To ensure the right tone is set with the local populace our soldiers should be equally schooled in the arts of diplomacy as well as those of war, no matter the type of operation they are engaged in.  When it comes to operations centred around the concept of &#8216;winning hearts and minds&#8217;, as we seem to be repeatedly told about those in Kandahar, this becomes all the more important.</p>
<p>As to the image of the CF&#8230; that&#8217;s a hard question to respond to and gives me pause for thought.  In my eagerness to see the CF move away from a public image that I view as having allowed for the neglect it saw under the liberals I realize I probably threw the baby out with the bath water.  That is to say, instead of moving away from the peacekeeper image, perhaps we should look at refining it so that it accurately presents and represents the Canadian Forces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Pitt</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/#comment-50226</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Pitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=2416#comment-50226</guid>
		<description>K- I see what you're saying, but what image do we have now?  War fighter or American puppet?  I know some may think that an excessive involvement with the UN from the mid-80's onward set the conditions for budget cuts but thats a myth.

The Swiss have a very professional and well equipped army and have not fought in a war in the last 2 centuries.  In Canada's case, it was simply bad politics and neglect by the liberals that the CF fell into the state of affairs it did.

Do you know more Canadians died in the Balkans than Afghanistan thus far?  UN missions are plenty dangerous and it takes a warfighter and a diplomat to succeed there.  There's an argument to be made that getting away from the "Peacekeeper training" has stalled progress in the asymmetric non-contingent, non-linear battle space that is Kandahar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K- I see what you&#8217;re saying, but what image do we have now?  War fighter or American puppet?  I know some may think that an excessive involvement with the UN from the mid-80&#8217;s onward set the conditions for budget cuts but thats a myth.</p>
<p>The Swiss have a very professional and well equipped army and have not fought in a war in the last 2 centuries.  In Canada&#8217;s case, it was simply bad politics and neglect by the liberals that the CF fell into the state of affairs it did.</p>
<p>Do you know more Canadians died in the Balkans than Afghanistan thus far?  UN missions are plenty dangerous and it takes a warfighter and a diplomat to succeed there.  There&#8217;s an argument to be made that getting away from the &#8220;Peacekeeper training&#8221; has stalled progress in the asymmetric non-contingent, non-linear battle space that is Kandahar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy El Saghir</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/#comment-50204</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy El Saghir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=2416#comment-50204</guid>
		<description>You seem strangely adamant about that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem strangely adamant about that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent-K</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/#comment-50160</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent-K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=2416#comment-50160</guid>
		<description>No argument there Patrick.  Hillier has enamoured me only due to his putting a public face on the CF, which I think has hid for far to long and let the public (and politicians) play up the 'peacekeeper' image with which I believe has contributed to the overall degradation of the CF.  Not to say that I'm against peacekeeping.  Rather, I think that the image promoted within Canada about peacekeeping has been more harmful to the CF then helpful.

As to Hillier's impact on the CF, I leave such speculation to those like yourself who are in a far better place to pass judgement then I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No argument there Patrick.  Hillier has enamoured me only due to his putting a public face on the CF, which I think has hid for far to long and let the public (and politicians) play up the &#8216;peacekeeper&#8217; image with which I believe has contributed to the overall degradation of the CF.  Not to say that I&#8217;m against peacekeeping.  Rather, I think that the image promoted within Canada about peacekeeping has been more harmful to the CF then helpful.</p>
<p>As to Hillier&#8217;s impact on the CF, I leave such speculation to those like yourself who are in a far better place to pass judgement then I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Pitt</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/#comment-50156</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Pitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=2416#comment-50156</guid>
		<description>K- yeah but he's a star the way Nickelback are stars. A lot of fizz, but maybe you don't like the taste of the gin.  In large part because of Hillier the CF lost some of it's esteem as a professional soldiering force that is capable of being more than just war fighters.  If not for Hillier the CF might not have made the move to extend it's ops in Kandahar.

While the CF got a makeover to look tougher - the expense has been at the lives of soldiers who history will determine if they died in vain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K- yeah but he&#8217;s a star the way Nickelback are stars. A lot of fizz, but maybe you don&#8217;t like the taste of the gin.  In large part because of Hillier the CF lost some of it&#8217;s esteem as a professional soldiering force that is capable of being more than just war fighters.  If not for Hillier the CF might not have made the move to extend it&#8217;s ops in Kandahar.</p>
<p>While the CF got a makeover to look tougher - the expense has been at the lives of soldiers who history will determine if they died in vain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Smart</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/#comment-50155</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=2416#comment-50155</guid>
		<description>Dallaire's got a way better moustache too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dallaire&#8217;s got a way better moustache too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent-K</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/#comment-50150</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent-K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=2416#comment-50150</guid>
		<description>The question in my mind is what kind of donut would the Captain Canuck be?  Chocolate raspberry filled?  A cherry donut with white icing sugar?

Seriously though... for whatever people think of Hillier, I will credit him with being the only CDS whom I can name without having to look them up (with the exception of Boyle, but only thanks to the 'Somalia Affair').  If he did one thing right, I think it was being outspoken and present to the public at large concering current operations.  Let's hope who ever follows him continues that tradition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question in my mind is what kind of donut would the Captain Canuck be?  Chocolate raspberry filled?  A cherry donut with white icing sugar?</p>
<p>Seriously though&#8230; for whatever people think of Hillier, I will credit him with being the only CDS whom I can name without having to look them up (with the exception of Boyle, but only thanks to the &#8216;Somalia Affair&#8217;).  If he did one thing right, I think it was being outspoken and present to the public at large concering current operations.  Let&#8217;s hope who ever follows him continues that tradition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Pitt</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/#comment-50148</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Pitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=2416#comment-50148</guid>
		<description>you gotta love it - retiring on July 1st....add another nickname to his list:

Captain Canuck.  Maybe we can name a highway after him....or better yet...a dough nut at Tim Horton's. 

We went from Dallaire's shake hands with the devil and awareness of PTSD and genocide in Africa to "terrorists are scumbags", tanks in Afghanistan and questionable prisoner transfer.

(Yes I know Romeo was never a CDS)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you gotta love it - retiring on July 1st&#8230;.add another nickname to his list:</p>
<p>Captain Canuck.  Maybe we can name a highway after him&#8230;.or better yet&#8230;a dough nut at Tim Horton&#8217;s. </p>
<p>We went from Dallaire&#8217;s shake hands with the devil and awareness of PTSD and genocide in Africa to &#8220;terrorists are scumbags&#8221;, tanks in Afghanistan and questionable prisoner transfer.</p>
<p>(Yes I know Romeo was never a CDS)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Pitt</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/#comment-50147</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Pitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=2416#comment-50147</guid>
		<description>Hell fucking no</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell fucking no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy El Saghir</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/04/cds-general-rick-hillier-retires/#comment-50146</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy El Saghir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=2416#comment-50146</guid>
		<description>Now that there is an opening, its time that you think about getting that commission back...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that there is an opening, its time that you think about getting that commission back&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
