A Waste Of Time

Space July 17, 2008, Matthew Good

Throughout the day I have fielded numerous emails from readers regarding my last entry, which are what ultimately convinced me to remove it altogether. All of them made the same point, and it really is something that I should have thought through before I began typing this morning – I have nothing to prove, nor do I need to defend this website or my career. Adding fuel to useless fires is a pointless exercise. To be honest, in cases such as these, it’s a pleasure to realize that this site has such a well-rounded and intelligent readership – especially one that can point out that such rebuttals are a waste of time.

That said; there is a bit from the previous entry that I did want to keep, so I have included it below. Again, thanks to those of you that contacted me and talked some sense. We all need that now and again.

Archived

Arms proliferators feed off of conflict and the horrors that they produce. The big five have enjoyed that luxury for decades and yet we do not question it while, like lemmings, deride the inevitable backlash that it produces. The only difference between cutting the head off of a captured contractor and video taping it and helping to remove an unfriendly government and replace it with a friendly dictatorial regime is that one gets broadcast on the internet and the thousands of deaths produced by the other doesn’t. The point is; both are criminal and cowardly, but one cannot be viewed as such because to do so would require us to admit that even though we view ourselves as morally superior, we have been complicit in evils of considerable magnitude.

For a recent example of such culpability look no further than the Montréal International Conference on Haiti, what it produced, and our ultimate inclusion in the coup engineered to remove Aristide from power. Of course, here at home, Aristide was painted in a light necessary to maintain the illusion that freedom was being gifted the Haitian people. What wasn’t highlighted was that the ‘freedom fighters’ that entered the country from the Dominican to help depose him were drug lords and thugs – not some movement bent on bringing peace and stability to the country. In the end, it was Aristide’s refusal to privatize Haitian industries that led to his political demise and loss of control. And, like most Latin American leaders placed in that position, paranoia and a thin grasp on the maintenance of law and order pushed him into a corner in which acts that he might otherwise decry became undesirable options.

As Peter Hallward put it in March of 2004…

“Aristide was forced from office on Sunday by people who have little in common except their opposition to his progressive policies and their refusal of the democratic process. With the enthusiastic backing of Haiti’s former colonial master, a leader elected with overwhelming popular support has been driven from office by a loose association of convicted human rights abusers, seditious former army officers and pro-American business leaders.

It’s obvious that Aristide’s expulsion offered Jacques Chirac a long-awaited chance to restore relations with an American administration he dared to oppose over the attack on Iraq. It’s even more obvious that the characterisation of Aristide as yet another crazed idealist corrupted by absolute power sits perfectly with the political vision championed by George Bush, and that the Haitian leader’s downfall should open the door to a yet more ruthless exploitation of Latin American labour.

If you’ve been reading the mainstream press over the past few weeks, you’ll know that this peculiar version of events has been carefully prepared by repeated accusations that Aristide rigged fraudulent elections in 2000; unleashed violent militias against his political opponents; and brought Haiti’s economy to the point of collapse and its people to the brink of humanitarian catastrophe.

But look a little harder at those elections. An exhaustive and convincing report by the International Coalition of Independent Observers concluded that “fair and peaceful elections were held” in 2000, and by the standard of the presidential elections held in the US that same year they were positively exemplary.”

And where were we? Well, JTF2 was holding the airport, waiting for US operatives that had secured Aristide to arrive and usher him into exile so that the so-called ‘liberators’ of Haiti could do the rest. Haitians were indeed liberated in the two weeks following the coup, hundreds of them in fact. All by death.

We are not at war with a religion, only a fool would presume as much, only a fool who hasn’t the wherewithal to actually educate themselves would sit easy on the conclusion that we are currently engaged in a world wide struggle against several billion people that ‘hate us for our freedoms’. Generalizations and fear are terrorism’s most profound productions. That being the case, it would seem that we have been terrorized by voices amongst us as equally as by those zealots that adhere to an entirely warped and politicized religious ideology. There are examples aplenty stretching back through time that provide context with regards to how easy it is to scare the weak minded into the belief that what they fear is actually greater than what it is. That said; many have done a fantastic job of insuring that ignorance remains commonplace so that such distractions can continue to convolute reason. That is not to say that threats do not exist, only that we are just as much a threat to our own way of life than any exterior threat. And those that perpetuate that fear are, in the end, no better than those they condemn, even if violence isn’t their primary tool. Intolerance and ignorance have killed far more people through their complacency in our collective history than any single cabal of individuals. Because without that complacency their evils would never have succeeded in the first place.

What we stand for, in the end, cannot be defended by a staunch belief in insularity while at the same time promoting the violent deliverance of freedom to others. That is merely a hypocritical position preferred by those that often believe that arguments are won simply by the volume at which they profess their beliefs and not on their actual merits.

If ignorance is indeed bliss, then welcome to an age of perpetual contentment.

COMMENTS | RSS
Arrow This little symbol lets you @ another comment
  1. Reply to this comment
    Brian Smart said 175 days ago:

    Frank Llyod Wright once said:

    “Early in life, I had to choose between honest arrogance and hypocritical humility. I chose honest arrogance and have seen no occasion to change.”

  2. Reply to this comment
    strangedays3 said 175 days ago:

    Good for you - the bigger man as I thought you were

    If it weren’t for you I would have no clue what’s ACTUALLY happening in the world ty

  3. Reply to this comment
    jennykerr said 175 days ago:

    The old saying goes: Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

  4. Reply to this comment
    Nothingman said 175 days ago:

    Yeah, I had mixed feelings about that entry. I’d probably do (and have done) the same thing if someone started making unfounded insults about me, but from an outsider perspective the whole thing did seem a bit petty. To be honest, it doesn’t matter what you do or say, they’ll believe what they want to believe. The easiest and most convenient insult when dealing with a celebrity is to either call them a “has been” or a “nobody”. It’s the simplest way to make an insult sound personal without actually having to do any background research. Don’t take it personal. It just means that they don’t like you, but they have anything intelligent to come back with.

    ps. I was sad to see the entry about the Red Cross emblem disappear last night. I completely agreed with you on that, but it was removed while I was writing a comment. Ah well, I suppose when you talk about those types of issues, the emails must get ridiculous.

  5. Reply to this comment
    Nothingman said 175 days ago:

    *they have nothing

    pps. I miss the edit tool.

  6. Reply to this comment
    Matthew Good said 175 days ago:

    Actually, it was a case of coming to one’s senses. Yes, your comment was deleted. The reason? Because ad hominem attacks are not tolerated here. That is plainly stated right here.

  7. Reply to this comment
    KET said 175 days ago:

    Come on now, you took it down because I wouldn’t stop commenting, didn’t you?

    (You’re absolutely right, though. Nothing to prove.)

  8. Reply to this comment
    handles said 175 days ago:

    I am not so well-rounded… I just want to know how your dog is doing!!!!!

    throw us a frickin bone, matt!

  9. Reply to this comment
    Matthew Good said 175 days ago:

    Casey is a little better. The vet said they were either heat or chemical burns. He’s on Prednisone.

  10. Reply to this comment
    Sebrina said 175 days ago:

    I just have nothing to add that no one else already said about the previous, which I barely had time to skim anyway.

    However, I’m very glad to hear Casey is beginning to get better :)

  11. Reply to this comment
    RRC said 175 days ago:

    This site’s recent 3-month 30% growth rate is amazing. Your ‘opponent’ realized a traffic increase of just 15% with a similar base over the same time period. The more site traffic, the more ad revenue. You could make a lot by placing ads on this site (think of all the Bling! you could buy!).

    Wow - what happened in Oct ‘07 and May ‘08? Was there an online event? Traffic exploded in both months - more than tripled - but then went back down to average. Don’t take my word for it: http://www.alexa.com.

  12. Reply to this comment
    sweet chili said 175 days ago:

    I am glad to know that you have come to your senses……definately more what like I would expect from you. ANd on the opening “idiocy” point…maybe just for saying that you are.. :)

  13. Reply to this comment
    sweet chili said 175 days ago:

    mind you, I am the one that cannot write proper english…blush*

  14. Reply to this comment
    Matthew Good said 175 days ago:

    [quote comment="58701"]Yeah, I had mixed feelings about that entry.[/quote]

    And rightly so.

  15. Reply to this comment
    jennykerr said 175 days ago:

    [quote comment="58700"]The old saying goes: Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.[/quote] To clarify my statement SweetChili, this remark was in regards to the idiocy of the comments made against MG and his standpoints… I would NOT want to see my comments interpreted as something other than that. Thank you.

  16. Reply to this comment
    Nothingman said 175 days ago:

    [quote comment="58705"]Yes, your comment was deleted. The reason? Because ad hominem attacks are not tolerated here. That is plainly stated right here.[/quote]

    Wait…that wasn’t directed at me, was it? I wasn’t talking about one of my own comments being removed. I meant that I was sad about the whole story being removed from the site. It was removed before I was able to post my comment.

    …Perhaps your comment wasn’t even directed at me…I’ve just been a big paranoid ever since I think one of my comments was misinterpreted a few weeks ago.

  17. Reply to this comment
    Orangepekoe said 175 days ago:

    Oh, we who are passionate like to speak first, think later. Hindsight is 20/20….and bites me in the ass every time.
    So glad to hear Casey is on the road to recovery.

  18. Reply to this comment
    Matthew Good said 175 days ago:

    [quote comment="58715"][quote comment="58705"]Yes, your comment was deleted. The reason? Because ad hominem attacks are not tolerated here. That is plainly stated right here.[/quote]

    Wait…that wasn’t directed at me, was it? I wasn’t talking about one of my own comments being removed. I meant that I was sad about the whole story being removed from the site. It was removed before I was able to post my comment.

    …Perhaps your comment wasn’t even directed at me…I’ve just been a big paranoid ever since I think one of my comments was misinterpreted a few weeks ago.[/quote]

    No, no, not at all.

  19. Reply to this comment
    Nothingman said 175 days ago:

    Phew. My bad. I was thrown off by it being directly after my comment.

    Apologies.

  20. Reply to this comment
    Matthew Good said 175 days ago:

    No, I was saying you made a good point :)

  21. Reply to this comment
    mark g said 175 days ago:

    I’m glad someone’s taking a stand against the idiots on the net these days. its too often an uncontrolled and hard to manage medium, and those who feel they can get away with being an idiot often do. it’s why we have words like pwned, fail and BAM HEADSHOT. i feel sad for the future generation that will grow up without any sense of right and wrong, who will be more likely to be gullible enough to listen to what is told to them without questioning it’s validity. sadly it’s this kind of idiocy and propaganda on the internet that has led us to much of the problems of the last decade.

    and thats great news on casey.

  22. Reply to this comment
    susan said 175 days ago:

    …apparently I missed something along the way.

  23. Reply to this comment
    Pauly said 175 days ago:

    Hey Matt,

    what ever happen to all those pictures (could of been video’s too, I forget) of boom boxes that people sent in?

  24. Reply to this comment
    polarbear said 175 days ago:

    Thank you, thank you, thank you, Matt. I didn’t even bother to post because those were my thoughts exactly,
    “A WASTE OF TIME” No disrespect to you.

    However, I was tempted to tell you that 500 starbucks on the east coast are closing down. Somehow, I think you were probably already knew. Hmmm, would that be to the left or to the right? :) :)

  25. Reply to this comment
    Matthew Good said 175 days ago:

    Hahaha.

  26. Reply to this comment
    Dale Mugford said 175 days ago:

    [quote comment="58710"]This site’s recent 3-month

    30% growth rate is amazing. Your ‘opponent’ realized a traffic increase of just 15% with a similar base over the same time period. The more site traffic, the more ad revenue. You could make a lot by placing ads on this site (think of all the Bling! you could buy!).

    Wow - what happened in Oct ‘07 and May ‘08? Was there an online event? Traffic exploded in both months - more than tripled - but then went back down to average. Don’t take my word for it: http://www.alexa.com./quote

    Those were around the release of Hospital Music and the announcement of the Tour. There’s always an influx of music-only interested visitors.

  27. Reply to this comment
    Matthew Good said 175 days ago:

    And when Dale posts pictures of himself in a speedo.

  28. Reply to this comment
    Krista said 175 days ago:

    I must’ve missed all of the commotion.
    Dale in a speedo?? Is the world ready for that? Only one way to find out.

  29. Reply to this comment
    Susan H. said 175 days ago:

    Matt, I’m glad you took that last entry down. My first thought after reading it was you did not need to explain or defend yourself to us, especially the long time readers of this blog. What it did create was a flaming comment war on the other site that I can’t believe I wasted my time glancing through. I feel I’ve learned so much with my daily visits to this website, with much more to learn. Thanks.

    Glad Casey is feeling a little better.

  30. Reply to this comment
    RRC said 175 days ago:

    [quote comment="58727"][quote comment="58710"]This site’s recent 3-month

    30% growth rate is amazing. Your ‘opponent’ realized a traffic increase of just 15% with a similar base over the same time period. The more site traffic, the more ad revenue. You could make a lot by placing ads on this site (think of all the Bling! you could buy!).

    Wow - what happened in Oct ‘07 and May ‘08? Was there an online event? Traffic exploded in both months - more than tripled - but then went back down to average. Don’t take my word for it: http://www.alexa.com./quote

    Those were around the release of Hospital Music and the announcement of the Tour. There’s always an influx of music-only interested visitors.[/quote]

    Thank-you for your insight, Dale. Your website has contributed a great deal to my rehab - I will invite everyone to my celebration party in one month, but I’ll understand if everyone is otherwise occupied. I recommend that you consider linking to this remarkable, effective non-profit organization: http://www.kiva.org. I’ve already “loaned” $120 to an Iraqi small business owner (i.e. you do get your money back if you want it, but I don’t want my money back). KIVA is a brilliant, well-managed, altruistic non-partisan organization based in San Francisco. Give anything.

  31. Reply to this comment
    AaronV said 175 days ago:

    I would contend that ‘we’ are infact at war with religion, but that of those in power here in North America who have their own preconceived notions of freedoms and rights. But its too fargone by now to be able to trace anything back to its roots.

    The fact is, until two sides can come up with the fortitude to call a spade a spade, and put arbitrary religious differences in the past, conflict will exist.

  32. Reply to this comment
    patrick bell said 175 days ago:

    lots of traffic hey? Time to fire up the ads in this site….pepper it with pop ups…and they say teachers are Lefties….poor teachers aren’t.

  33. Reply to this comment
    Amanda Kyffin said 175 days ago:

    “If ignorance is indeed bliss, then welcome to an age of perpetual contentment.”
    That ones sticking with me.

  34. Reply to this comment
    "BJ" said 175 days ago:

    [quote comment="58708"]Casey is a little better. The vet said they were either heat or chemical burns. He’s on Prednisone.[/quote]

    I can’t help but ask (being a vet myself) - any idea as to how he got burns on his feet? Living in Az I see burns from the hot ground on feet all the time. But I’ve also see burns caused by various types of floor cleaners. Did the vet give you any antibiotics? I hope his feet feel better soon.

    Dr. BJ

  35. Reply to this comment
    jnifer said 175 days ago:

    Well I am glad as well that last entry was removed. In all honesty, it gave me a headache. You dont need to defend and explain yoursellf, just for the record.

    I am glad to hear Casey is getting better. A possibly chemical burn?? Ouch, poor lil guy.

    And…Dale in a speedo, ummm, where can I view???

  36. Reply to this comment
    jnifer said 175 days ago:

    Oh and I must add…..I absolutely LOVE the gold icon thingy beside my name. How cool is that!!!

  37. Reply to this comment
    Brent MacLean said 175 days ago:

    [quote comment="58732"]I would contend that ‘we’ are in fact at war with religion[/quote]

    Total agreement.

  38. Reply to this comment
    Orangepekoe said 175 days ago:

    [quote comment="58740"][quote comment="58732"]I would contend that ‘we’ are in fact at war with religion[/quote]

    Total agreement.[/quote]

    I second, third and fourth that.

  39. Reply to this comment
    sarah-renee` said 175 days ago:

    Well, you’ve discovered the one reason I check this place out…Dale in a speedo. But shh, don’t tell anybody. Don’t want to sound creepy.

    Good to hear Casey is better! You know I was packing up my car and walked barefoot out on the cement in the sun and I couldn’t stand it for more than a few seconds. I’ve never walked barefoot on sunny concrete before! It hurt like hell!! All that I could think about was that I was glad my cats are indoor only, their poor little paws would be burnt to a crisp if they tried to walk on that hot concrete.

  40. Reply to this comment
    ciavarro said 175 days ago:

    Have they started casting for the two part The Hobbit project?

    Think there might be Speedos in middle earth?

  41. Reply to this comment
    AaronV said 175 days ago:

    [quote comment="58743"]Have they started casting for the two part The Hobbit project?

    Think there might be Speedos in middle earth?[/quote]

    i thought the dead horse was flogged enough, but this revived it a little.

    Perhaps those living as far east as the Brandywine might engage in the wearing of speedos.

  42. Reply to this comment
    Robert R said 175 days ago:

    I just wanted to second that recommendation concerning KIVA. I’ve been a lending member for a few years. I’ve help make a couple dozen small loans to people all over the world. The people running it are first class, and you can always tell people you meet at cocktail parties “I’m in International Banking” if they ask you what you do!

    Just google Kiva, and start out with 25 bucks!

  43. Reply to this comment
    calgarykeri said 175 days ago:

    Glad to hear Casey is doing better.. Poor lil guy. Keep us updated

    Dale in a speedo?

  44. Reply to this comment
    Moonlight Graham said 175 days ago:

    Didn’t catch the other entry (nor do i care considering the apparent fallout), but i’m glad you kept your article on arms proliferation/regime change. It was a good read. I like that last line also.

    Matt you are obviously an anti-war advocate & have made many logical arguments towards it (here & in past entries). I despise war/violence also, however i struggle in wondering at what point is violent intervention necessary? Ie: the genocides in Rwanda & Darfur. Would it be possible to stop such events without violence? I sometimes look at problems with a basic utilitarian view, so would a pacifistic approach to Rwanda/Darfur result in more or less violence/suffering than if there was violent intervention by the international community or otherwise? Same could be asked about WWII. I struggle with the answer to this question, & would be interested in your thoughts.

  45. Reply to this comment
    Patrick Pitt said 174 days ago:

    Is this post about Batman? No? It should be….it’s that good.

  46. Reply to this comment
    billykyjoe said 174 days ago:

    Glad to hear that Casey is getting better. Poor pup.
    I’m also glad you came to your senses and removed that post. You have no need to defend your blog or prove anything.
    I think I will avoid Dale in a speedo at all costs. The mental picture is bad enough.

  47. Reply to this comment
    Duane Storey said 174 days ago:

    Did you see it Pitt? I want to hit the Imax this weekend and catch it.

  48. Reply to this comment
    Emily Plunkett said 174 days ago:

    Hey. I hate to bring this up, but there was one thing you mentioned in your now removed post that I’m extremely curious to know your opinion on, whether you even have one at all on the topic. Before anything else in life, my passion is music and I am bipolar - I must to bring it up.

    As you said, I figured you haven’t met anyone by the name of Stephen Page - but I am assuming you’ve run into a Steven Page once or twice in your travels. The only reason I ask for your take is because there’s a stigma to his situation that I’ll probably have to bring up with my mom when she finds out. She not one to see a connection between drug use with mental illness and is a huge BNL fan - Steven in particular. So I’m going to hear all about it when I see her and I at least want to know that I’m not completely crazy in what I think.

    In my opinion, I can’t view it as a complete shame on his name, body of work or who he is as a human being. From what I’ve concluded in my research, drug addiction/abuse should be treated with the same humanity as depression and I know that he’s been dealing with his own depression for years now. Ever since you became public with your bipolar, I’ve actually had this feeling that it would only be a mater of time before Steven would do something that would wake him up. When I heard that about the bust, it was absolutely no surprise, and I’ve become worried that the public is latching onto something that shouldn’t be a negative. It’s not like he’s had a history of complete asinine behaviour like that a certain other Canadian front man and as I said, I did see this coming, but because it’s so socially accepted as a reason to completely render him a lost cause (even on a first offense during a midlife crisis), it’s only adding to a stigma my mom’s embraced, even after her daughter’s diagnosis.

    What do you think?

  49. Reply to this comment
    Fearless4 said 174 days ago:

    Crap…

    Being on the east coast, I check matthewgood.org every morning. Due to the time difference, I’m basically a day behind. This means I usually miss those rare and juicy deleted posts and comments. When I log on the following morning and see folks talkin’ about all the “drama” I missed, it takes me back to 1983, when all of my friends set up their VCR’s properly to record the Global Premiere of Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” video, while I didn’t (there were just so many buttons on those things!) and the next day was all talk about something that I wanted to participate in, but just couldn’t! How frustrating.

    Or, it was just like that episode of South Park, when Kyle was always one toy behind during the “Chinpokomon” craze. I know just how he felt.

    I like it when someone, either intentionally or unintentionally, plays Devil’s Advocate with Matt, because Matt’s rebuttals are usually so short, blunt and effective. We need a secret site where the “Deleted Posts and idiot comments” go to die.

  50. Reply to this comment
    Fearless4 said 174 days ago:

    Ohhhhhh…how yummy. Steven Page. Now THERE’s a fun story. Yes! Let’s open that can of worms shall we? The sketchy details are so interesting!

  51. Reply to this comment
    Anna said 174 days ago:

    [quote comment="58708"]Casey is a little better. The vet said they were either heat or chemical burns. He’s on Prednisone.[/quote]

    Aww that’s what my dog is on, too. Makes him pee like a racehorse cause he’s so thirsty all the time- he’ll be on it forever though. Hopefully Casey is only on it for a little while :)

  52. Reply to this comment
    KET said 174 days ago:

    I think I’m getting dumber. I can’t make head nor tails of this comment section. Some mysterious person we can’t seem to identify is apparently throwing ad hominem attacks around… Dale’s wearing a speedo… site traffic, KIVA, Batman, hobbits… Steven Page? I need to go back to bed.

  53. Reply to this comment
    angelboo said 174 days ago:

    I am with you KET… I had a couple of “HUH” moments while reading this commenting section this morning as well..

  54. Reply to this comment
    Patrick Pitt said 174 days ago:

    Duane YES! At 1230 in the AM and it was worth it….

    Dammit it was so good!

  55. Reply to this comment
    Alex Ross said 174 days ago:

    I still don’t understand the point of deleting a post after everyone’s already read it…

  56. Reply to this comment
    revisited said 174 days ago:

    But when the lights came back on, the train was at the station. What’s up with that?

  57. Reply to this comment
    Agent-K said 174 days ago:

    [quote comment="58761"]I still don’t understand the point of deleting a post after everyone’s already read it…[/quote]

    If only so as to not further fan the flames. When it comes to something as petty and trivial as the blogger beef (think rapper beef, but far less violent and nowhere near as financially profitable) we nearly experienced yesterday, it is simply better to walk away. There is no point talking to someone who will not listen, after all.

  58. Reply to this comment
    Sebrina said 174 days ago:

    [quote comment="58751"]Is this post about Batman? No? It should be….it’s that good.[/quote]

    I agree. The Dark Knight?! Tonight?! I’m the only one excited in my family.

  59. Reply to this comment
    mlvegas said 174 days ago:

    Glad to hear that Casey is doing better……
    As always,
    Love from Buffalo

  60. Reply to this comment
    Brian Smart said 174 days ago:

    quoting jnifer: “Oh and I must add…..I absolutely LOVE the gold icon thingy beside my name. How cool is that!!!

    Ya I got one too! Mine is kind of like a gaelic-celtic-mystical-magical thing. Makes me wanna get all weird like Stevie Nicks or something. I think I’ll go an have a whole bunch of Chilkoot Lagers tonight and then go have it tatooed on me arse!

  61. Reply to this comment
    Nothingman said 174 days ago:

    [quote comment="58760"]Duane YES! At 1230 in the AM and it was worth it….

    Dammit it was so good![/quote]

    Bah, I’m jealous. I want to see it so bad, but I probably won’t be able to until like Monday or so.

  62. Reply to this comment
    PharmingForDissidence said 174 days ago:

    not trying to beat a dead horse here but i’d be fucking pissed if some loser from saskafuckingdelphia called ME a lefty elitist.

    an elitist who lives in one of the poorest neighborhoods in vancouver. huh. makes sense if you’re from saskatchewan i guess. im guessing by elitist they mean someone who belongs to Amnesty International and can afford to take their dogs to the vet and buy themselves a funky hat….

    maybe that loser should stick to blogging about potash. i hear its highly exciting and politically neutral!

  63. Reply to this comment
    Patrick Pitt said 174 days ago:

    “not trying to beat a dead horse here but i’d be fucking pissed if some loser from saskafuckingdelphia called ME a lefty elitist.”

    Why? There’s so many other better things to waste your emotional energy on.

  64. Reply to this comment
    Patrick Pitt said 174 days ago:

    oh nothingman - you must not wait that long. it is to your benefit to get out and see it as often as possible before then…it is that good.

  65. Reply to this comment
    KET said 174 days ago:

    [quote comment="58771"] There’s so many other better things to waste your emotional energy on.[/quote]
    True. I’m wasting mine right now trying to figure out if the Batman movie > waiting in lines and sitting in a crowded theatre.

  66. Reply to this comment
    Patrick Pitt said 174 days ago:

    YES!!!!

    You have the shirt too!

    Look I was bit fearful for my friends at Detective Comics what with the success of Iron man and the Redux of the Hulk - both successes in my opinion.

    THERE IS NO CONTEST.

    While Marvel has always played Burgerking to DC’s Mc Donald’s; Marvel has through more interesting characters and storylines developed as the comic book force in the movie world.

    But DC is the Champ, and it’s because of the Bat.

    People won’t associate V for Vendetta and Watchmen with DC the way they do Spidey, X-Men and The Avengers with Marvel - even though they are vastly superior films and adaptations.

    But Batman is a story that stretches over 7 decades, and when you put in the right actors with the right director who don’t try to do too much but just let you relate to the characters you’ve got something that the mutants can never have - realism.

    And let me say this, while Ledger is absolutely incredible in this role (one that I was skeptical could be taken from Jack) the rest of the cast (Eckhart and Bale) are all worthy of accolades.

    Go stand in line, embrace the inner nerd.

  67. Reply to this comment
    PharmingForDissidence said 174 days ago:

    lol @ pitt…yes, there are better things to waste energy on…like whining about the price of Beck’s beer…*sigh*..but that comment just begged to be picked apart..as im sure alot of the mg community members have already done to that particular site…

    but hey, im just a “lefty elitist” from Alberta…*sigh*

    better crawl back into my oil barrel and you know, do whatever it is lefty elitists do, like drink expensive German beer! muaha!

  68. Reply to this comment
    kdog said 174 days ago:

    There’s so many other better things to waste your emotional energy on.[/quote]

    Yes Patrick, your right! Like where we can find these so called pictures of Dale in a speeeeeedo that Matt was talking about ;-)

  69. Reply to this comment
    Patrick Pitt said 174 days ago:

    oh yeah, i’m right on that one.

    oh pharm - you’re….from….alberta…..maybe there isn’t anything better to waste your emotional energy on.

    my apologies….i’m so embarrassed.

    CARRY ON!

  70. Reply to this comment
    T-Lee said 174 days ago:

    Aw, man.. what did I miss?

    I go to Furry Crack for one day and miss an entire deleted post? Boooooooooo ya

  71. Reply to this comment
    Patrick Pitt said 174 days ago:

    Furry Crack, not into it.

  72. Reply to this comment
    T-Lee said 174 days ago:

    lol dude. lol

    Furry Creek, BC…

    Still here. wee bit cloudy… :o(

  73. Reply to this comment
    PharmingForDissidence said 174 days ago:

    @ pitt: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    atleast its not saskatchewan!! (no offense to any mg saskatchewanite members!)

  74. Reply to this comment
    PharmingForDissidence said 174 days ago:

    you know, being from alberta has its advantages..like when i go to ontario and people stand in awe as they see my bright red calgary flames jersey sticking out from the crowd…some of them never having seen one in person before…and then i get to proudly proclaim HEY ATLEAST ITS NOT THE GODDAMN OILERS!

    being a flames fan so close to edmonton sucks. i get better reception from toronto fans, which is strangely odd and comforting at the same time!

    i think in quebec they could hardly believe i had the balls to wear the jersey which made it even more fun! no better way to say “hey im not from here and im far faaaar from being french!”

    hee hee

  75. Reply to this comment
    Patrick Pitt said 174 days ago:

    yeah whatev’s t-lee: if a chicana is into the Furry Creek, she need not justify to me.

    pharm - you must always wear the colours when you find yourself in enemy territory.

    I get a kick out of the hate on for Toronto - because much as John Safran to jJews, nobody talks more shit about Toronto and the Leafs - than Torontonians. Trust me.

  76. Reply to this comment
    PharmingForDissidence said 174 days ago:

    haha omg noticed that! some hang on to the dream and mention the 67 cup win like it was yesterday…meanwhile, edmonton fans like to rub it in that calgary hasnt won since 89..and i retort that its atleast not 67! and i gotta hit a lil below the belt and remind all the oiler fans that hey, keenan might be comparable to stalin but atleast he didnt get drunk and run over a girl like mactavish! (who “rotted” in a jail cell for A YEAR for that incident while watching the team he was supposed to be playing for on prison tv! haha! and was also forbidden in his contract to drive the team bus after that!)

    buuuuuuuuuuuuuurn!

    you’d be surprised at the toronto fan base we have here in alberta….but yeah, you’re right..no one talks more shit about toronto than the people who wear their jerseys!

  77. Reply to this comment
    chels said 174 days ago:

    [quote comment="58708"]Casey is a little better. The vet said they were either heat or chemical burns. He’s on Prednisone.[/quote]

    I’m happy Casey is doing better. :) If I saw my dog not be able to run I would be a mess. ( cause thats all she does.) I wonder what Casey steped in? Do you think it was antifreeze still?

  78. Reply to this comment
    billykyjoe said 174 days ago:

    Being from Ontario and living in Saskatchewan, as well as being a Leafs fan, has been awfully interesting. There are quite a few Leafs fan here as well, but most of them are just idiots about it. It’s impossible to talk to them about the Leafs. It’s always “we’re gonna do it this year…blah blah blah.” There’s also way too many Oilers fans. Still, I’m glad there are some Jays fans out here.
    Also, politics is odd. Went from NDP for like forever to the complete opposite in Sask Party. It just shows the changing ideals here. It’s fucked.

  79. Reply to this comment
    T-Lee said 174 days ago:

    [quote comment="58785"]yeah whatev’s t-lee: if a chicana is into the Furry Creek, she need not justify to me.

    I get a kick out of the hate on for Toronto - because much as John Safran to jJews, nobody talks more shit about Toronto and the Leafs - than Torontonians. Trust me.[/quote]

    LMFAO

    Really? Torontonians talk shit about their home boys? GET OOOOOOOOOUT!!!!!! That is something I have never heard before.

    “Quick pickin on the Leafs, man”

  80. Reply to this comment
    patrick bell said 174 days ago:

    Here is one for you guys. Over drinks last night my buddy and I argued “Evolution vs. Creation.” I know *yawn* those topics have been hashed over for decades. “Intelligent Design” was thrown in to spice things up a bit.

  81. Reply to this comment
    T-Lee said 174 days ago:

    So, what was the end result? Pardon the slight pun.

  82. Reply to this comment
    nelly said 174 days ago:

    Actually, I’m sure more readers were interested in the actual commentary that was made on the issue rather than what was said about you and your endeavours. You know you have let people say want they will. I too, had mixed feelings about that. You should have left that entry in as proof that you are big enough to deal with the negative feedback that is inevitable when someone feels threatened. Back what you believe. And let me tell you, there few people out there that are willing to lay it on the line like you do. That’s what blogging is about.

  83. Reply to this comment
    PharmingForDissidence said 174 days ago:

    t-lee, i dont think theres ever a end result in those debates, or atleast no definitive answers, which is why everyone picks those topics to begin with…

    the only reason a bible hangs around MY house is so that i can whip it out and use scripture against those who like to use it against me…

    an atheist quoting bible quotes at a christian quoting from the same book??

    now THATS interesting!

  84. Reply to this comment
    patrick bell said 174 days ago:

    As Pharming stated….The end result was that there was no end result as I believe one thing and he believes another thing and that ain’t ever going to change. Oh perhaps, I’ll witness a miracle and change my perspective. I doubt he will move on his and join my camp though. I have a hard time with the pseudo-science of “Intelligent Design.” There is no science to it. It is “Creationism” Don’t mask it under “ID.” I have no problem with people believing in supreme beings strictly on faith, in fact many of my close friends do and that doesn’t make me think any less of them. After all, the idea of a “higher creator” it is as old as humanity itself.

  85. Reply to this comment
    patrick bell said 174 days ago:

    And to add to the whole debate when referring to “evolution” and the notion that time is the key factor in species development he says to me, ” So, you are hinging your “faith” on “time.” I laughed and said,” Yeah, I know it exists.”

  86. Reply to this comment
    taro_twist said 174 days ago:

    Ok, so I almost couldn’t read the comments to this post because of all the Batman references. I can’t see it until next week (why god WHY??? people were freaking dressing up as members of the Batfamily for opening night, why was I not there?), and I die a little inside each time someone brings it up. ;.;

    I suppose I should take comfort in the fact that it sounds like it won’t let me down–and that it is kicking ass against the (admittedly totally awesome) Marvel movies! =P

    Um … but actually on topic, this makes me so happy that you took your last post down, Matt! That whole kerfuffle was making me very uncomfortable, and I’m proud of you for drawing the line and letting it go. :D

  87. Reply to this comment
    taro_twist said 174 days ago:

    Also, I’m relieved to hear that Casey is doing better. :) I hope the Prednisone helps!

  88. Reply to this comment
    susan said 174 days ago:

    [quote comment="58786"]you’d be surprised at the toronto fan base we have here in alberta….but yeah, you’re right..no one talks more shit about toronto than the people who wear their jerseys![/quote]

    Really? I don’t see much, just swarms of red from the Red Mile. But, thats just Calgary, not all of Alberta.

  89. Reply to this comment
    susan said 174 days ago:

    [quote comment="58751"]Is this post about Batman? No? It should be….it’s that good.[/quote]

    Damn it, I’m not seeing it until next weekend!

  90. Reply to this comment
    Patrick Pitt said 173 days ago:

    IT”S AMAZING!!!!

  91. Reply to this comment
    susan said 173 days ago:

    Hahaha, yeah I bet hey! Its already sold out at the IMAX.

  92. Reply to this comment
    Mark Mallett said 173 days ago:

    [quote comment="58705"]Actually, it was a case of coming to one’s senses. Yes, your comment was deleted. The reason? Because ad hominem attacks are not tolerated here. That is plainly stated right here.[/quote]

    I spoke out of turn in haste.

    It was unfair and ignorant. I ignored the rules laid out in plain view. I enjoy this site and what it stands for and I have abused the privelage.

    My sincerest apology to Matt and all of his readers.

    Peace

Hello person using a computer. It seems that you have not registered or logged in to comment. We're going to need you to go ahead and do one of those for us.