Somalia, Where’s That Again?

Somalia, the overlooked US proxy war that has somehow remained under the radar. In truth, the humanitarian crisis in the country is considered to be second only to the one in Darfur, and even then, the warning signs are looking just as ominous. As Mike Whitney put it recently…

“In 2006, the United States supported an alliance of Somali warlords known as the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) who established a base of operations in the western city of Baidoa. With the help of the US-backed Ethiopian army, western mercenaries, US Navy warships, and AC-130 gunships; the TFG was able capture Mogadishu and force the Islamic Courts Union (ICU) and their allies to retreat to the south. But, much like Iraq and Afghanistan, the resistance has coalesced into a tenacious guerrilla army which has returned to the capital and resumed the fight making it impossible for their Ethiopian rivals to govern. As the struggle continues, the humanitarian situation gets worse and worse. At least 2.6 million Somalis are now facing famine due to acute food shortages spurred by a prolonged drought, violence and high inflation. UN monitors have warned that the figure could hit exceed 3.5 million by the end of 2008.

The UN Security Council has played its traditional role as facilitator of American-backed imperial violence by failing to condemn US involvement in Somalia and by promising to send peacekeepers to mop up after violence subsides. The UN has shown no interest in stopping the carnage and have become little more than the glove-hand of the US military; an accomplice to Bush’s chronic adventurism.

In an interview with Amy Goodman on Democracy Now, Salim Lone, a columnist for the Daily Nation in Kenya and a former spokesperson for the UN mission in Iraq explains the UN’s role in providing the “go ahead” for the US invasion:

“The lawlessness of this particular war is astounding; the most lawless war of our generation. You know, all aggressive wars are illegal. But in this particular one, there have been violations of the UN Charter and gross violations of international human rights. But, in addition, there have been very concrete violations by the United States of two Security Council resolutions. The first one was the arms embargo imposed on Somalia, which the United States has been routinely flaunting for many years now. But then the US decided that that resolution was no longer useful, and they pushed through an appalling resolution in December, which basically gave the green light to Ethiopia to invade. They pushed through a resolution which said that the situation in Somalia was a threat to international peace and security, at a time when every independent report indicated, and Chatham House’s report on Wednesday also indicated, that the Islamic Courts Union had brought a high level of peace and stability that Somalia had not enjoyed in sixteen years.

So here was the UN Security Council going along with the American demand to pass a blatantly falsified UN resolution. And that resolution actually was a violation (of the) the UN Charter. You know, the UN Charter is like the American Constitution and the Security Council is not allowed to pass laws or rules that violate the Charter. And yet, who is going to correct them?”

The Bush administration has predictably invoked the “terrorist” hobgoblin to justify its involvement in Somalia, but no one is buying it. The ICU is not an Al Qaida affiliate or a terrorist organization despite the absurd claims of the State Dept. It is true that the ICU was trying to enforce Sharia Law, but a much milder form of Sharia than in Saudi Arabia. The ICU was the first government in over a decade to restore security and order to Somalia and–generally speaking–the people were supportive of the new regime.”

Besides the use of the Ethiopians as a military proxy, the United States has also used notorious Ethiopian facilities to house detainees in the War on Terror. Both CIA and FBI personnel have been linked to interrogations at Ethiopian jails that are renowned for their use of highly suspect interrogation methods.

For more background on this affair, search the archives for past entries: Keyword: Somalia.



Want to bookmark or share this entry?



This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 8th, 2008 at 8:18 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.



4 Comments

  1. RRC Says:

    Relax everyone. McCain will sort it out when he’s Presudent.

    John McCain misspoke and confused his African countries while talking to reporters on the Straight Talk Express today. “How can we bring pressure on the government of Somalia?” McCain asked, which prompted close aide Mark Salter to correct him. “Sudan,” Salter said. “Sudan,” McCain repeated.

  2. Doug Says:

    Crushed the American natives- killed most of the buffalo doing it.
    Crushed the Phillipinos who didn’t want to be part of the US- one US commander is reported to have ordered his troops to kill all males over 12 during the campaign.
    Too many US invasions, coups and terrorism programs to mention in Central, South America and the Caribbean to mention, deaths too.
    Iran in 1953 setting up 2 decades of the Shah and his SAVAK.
    2 decades in Vietnam and nobody knows for sure how many millions died even now.
    ETC…

    How is the US different from any other empire in history, besides the fact it has the greatest ability to destroy?

    US leaders talk endlessly about freedom and justice in the world, but what they really mean is they want the freedom to do pretty much what they want and any justice will be on their terms.

  3. vika Says:

    [quote comment="57933"]Crushed the American natives- killed most of the buffalo doing it.

    How is the US different from any other empire in history, besides the fact it has the greatest ability to destroy?

    US leaders talk endlessly about freedom and justice in the world, but what they really mean is they want the freedom to do pretty much what they want and any justice will be on their terms.[/quote]

    Every empire was great at its ability to destroy, divide and conquer. Not going too far back, France and England, Prussia, Spain… But, I think your last paragraph is the one that distinguishes US from those before it - all the former empires openly sought out new territories and resources and did not claim to stand for freedom and justice for all. At most they were going to bring education and culture to the savages - but that spoke for itself.

    Somalia… K’naan performed in Victoria on July 1. I still don’t know what Soobax is, but when I was trying to Google it, I stumbled on his article for Now magazine. It is from 2007, but a nice piece of writing of how Africa as it is now came about (with a little help from outsiders). Talking back to the Empire. http://www.nowtoronto.com/news/story.cfm?content=156808&archive=26,22,2007

  4. vika Says:

    For more info here is one recent UN resolution (June 2, 08):

    “By the terms of resolution 1816 (2008), which was unanimously adopted today, the Council decided that the States cooperating with the country’s transitional Government would be allowed, for a period of six months, to enter the territorial waters of Somalia and use “all necessary means” to repress acts of piracy and armed robbery at sea, in a manner consistent with relevant provisions of international law.

    The text was adopted with consent of Somalia, which lacks the capacity to interdict pirates or patrol and secure its territorial waters, following a surge in attacks on ships in the waters off the country’s coast, including hijackings of vessels operated by the World Food Programme and numerous commercial vessels — all of which posed a threat “to the prompt, safe and effective delivery of food aid and other humanitarian assistance to the people of Somalia”, and a grave danger to vessels, crews, passengers and cargo.”

    Why? Pirates take on all boats

    What does this mean? - I guess that first paragraph is open to interpretation…



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.




By registering to comment you agree to adhere to website policies.