Dark Matters by Daniel Regelbrugge
August 29, 2008, Administrator The following entry is by Daniel Regelbrugge, one of matthewgood.org’s first contributing authors. Dan is a veteran member of the United States Army, served in Iraq and throughout Europe, and currently works at the Pentagon. His area of expertise is in linguistics, primarily Russian.
Dark matter spreads surely across space and time. Currents of pestilent history and futures, as yet ill-described, lurch on and on toward the breech. An artery has been cut; just a prick at first, but now the pressure from the deep is rising. Scarlet fingers grasp at air, only to find the earth, and soon what was stirring feebly below surges once again upon the surface of things; upon the land, and into our lives. All vessels eventually spill their disease once more into the world.
To hear Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (known in some circles these days as “the dark lord”) speak of the strain the current abhorrent situation in the Caucuses has put on Russian/U.S. relations, one would think he were a pouting little boy wandering in from the playground after having been betrayed by the other bully.
To hear U.S. President George W. Bush (known in some circles as “soon to be ex-President”) speak about the same topic, one might conclude that he had an ace up his sleeve somewhere that would somehow force Russia to comply with his demands for immediate Russian withdrawal; neither supposition approaches the truth, nor the crux of the matter.
For several years Georgia has been living under the assumption that the advocated political and military partnership with the United States had somehow supplanted previous allegiance, or submission to the will of the Former Soviet Union—or the Russia of today. Clearly, both Georgia and the United States overestimated their ability to sow deep and lasting seeds quickly and firmly enough to withstand even the rumor of a resurgent Russia.
Clearly, the undercurrents of what was never really went away. Bygones are not bygones, and the perceived weakness or vulnerability that had characterized post Soviet Russia is being washed away-with blood.
But this resurgent Russia is not the great Bear that was the Soviet Union. This is not a monolith that instills fear by means of overwhelming and efficient use of might. This Russia is a hybrid of all possible means of achieving objectives without ever having to openly fight the other bullies on the playground-this Russia is more clever out of necessity, more industrious out of dogged desire to have as much or more than anyone else, and it is a country that will use the specter of it’s remnant WMD arsenal to instill horror in the hearts of any foe.
For several years Russia was forced, as a result of economic instability and pervasive reforms and restructuring of military and governmental organs on the operational level, to more or less turn a blind eye to the then burgeoning ties between Georgia and the United States.
Russia could do little but sit and watch as U.S. Special Forces Units equipped and trained Georgian troops. It was thought then, from the American perspective, that squeezing Russia at it’s underbelly, and stifling its ability to really thrive economically or politically in the 21st Century without eventually relenting and joining NATO would at the very least tap a catheter into Russia’s rich natural resources from which the U.S. and others could drink at will–at reduced, “friend” prices.
Russia needed time to understand fully the new lay of the land. Direct confrontation, both militarily and politically, is a thing of the past. So the Dark Lord waited. He waited for the Russian oil industry to come into synch with his political agenda so as to facilitate veiled control of Europe. He waited, and then he began the methodical construction on an international network of power—power, that is not necessarily plainly apparent, but which courses through the veins of the network like a disease shifting in dormancy until it’s handlers desire it to be bled on-demand wherever the need or opportunity presents itself.
Within the framework of the present situation in Georgia, The United States has proved itself, yet again, to be painfully naïve and ignorant in the ways of the dark arts of the Old World. It prances about like a powerful neophyte that just wants to play-no matter how roughly. For a long time it was enough to go on that way. The events of the twentieth century required the presence of such a strong, benign entity that could be trained by the old masters and turned onto whatever threat became manifest.
During the Cold War, however, the neophyte began to mature and to acquire a taste for power. It began to dabble in the dark arts of political manipulation in Central America and in the Middle East among other places. The world, it seemed, could be mapped, mined, and divided into portions–tributaries that provided different, but equally nourishing benefits. Oil from this place, diamonds from that—toys, sneakers, records, jump rope; you name it—all of it came from somewhere else. It was a not so subtle, if not altogether nefarious way of expanding a sphere of influence; or network, and the nation thrived, but eventually the rest of the world caught on to what was happening.
Russia had been paying very close attention to its old Cold War adversary. Uncle Sam’s tactics were deemed to have been effective to an extent, but ultimately crude, and limited in scope. The Dark Lord decided that Russia’s sphere of influence needed to be transformed; reestablished and broadened on different, more contemporary terms; terms that take into consideration all the best and worst lessons that the rise and potential fall of the United States portends.
Vladimir Putin spoke of “fairness” and “respect” the other day in an interview with a CNN correspondent that aired on the Vyesti Russian website. He spoke with what seemed like great concern about the need for a cease fire and for renewed dialogue as a means to bringing about a peaceful resolution. He reassured his interlocutor that Russia just wants a chance to live freely in peace and harmony, and then he seemed genuinely human in lamenting the loss of so many lives in the Georgian conflict.
Mr. Putin defended Russia’s current tactics in Georgia as being necessary to ensure the stability and safety of Russia’s people and its national interests. Moreover, he suggested that America had incited Georgia into action in South Ossetia as a means of drawing Russia’s fire prior to the upcoming Presidential elections to bolster U.S. national pride.
All of this is speculative, of course. I no longer discount any possibility that exists on the political stage.
But make no mistake: all that has come about in the Caucuses… all that has been released into the world as disease in the guise of war over the course of this past month among the Caucuses has been pre-meditated and dispassionately planned.
The United States is simply unable to commit fully to the defense of Georgia for a few reasons; reasons which were all too obvious to Russia as far back as 18 months ago when it was first mentioned that Russia would no longer participate in the Conventional Forces Europe Treaty (a treaty that was designed specifically to prevent a signatory from massing troops and equipment along any border without the other signatories stepping in—basically, to prevent a nation from doing exactly what Russia did)—The U.S. military is already stretched far too thin in Iraq, Afghanistan, and increasingly in Africa in support of the Global War on Terror. To imagine that America would be able to conjure anything but Black-Op support and tough talk for the defense of Georgian territory is simply not realistic; nor is it consistent with U.S. interests, based on what we’ve seen since roughly September 2001.
The Dark Lord sits back and smiles at the spectacle of U.S. and other Western officials pleading impotently for a ceasefire that cannot be forced; nor can it be brought about by means of tough talk or threats. For with every empty threat and pumping of fists that bear no strength, the new, resurgent Russia is empowered and made to seem even more so in the eyes of the world, to say nothing of the Russians, themselves.
And in the death tolls rising, the spreading of rumors recounting Russian brutality in Georgia, and the lack of any authoritative response or reprisal wrought from the West; America, in particular, the Russian Bear that is now a hybrid, porous vector bled softly as nocturnes into foreign lands rather than loudly onto sunlit fields of wartime glory, is recognized and quickened.
Vladimir Putin says he does not fear a renewal of the old hostilities, nor does he fear a possible descent into a new Cold War.
No, all things considered one should not suppose that he does.
Perhaps it is we who should be wary of what is yet to come.
This little symbol lets you @ another comment

Something that has been somewhat overlooked is how Putin is now capable of wheeling in power from behind the scenes (and possibly anywhere he likes). That he is no longer president has made him actually much more powerful since he can no longer be removed as easily and can use the new president to mislead - or perhaps not, how could you tell? and what could you do anyway?
It’s a fundamentally important new shift in Russian politics that has been mentioned only very slightly by the media. But most likely the Kremlin already has big plans that are well underway.
Putin is a genuine political mastermind. We rarely see the catch until the plan is hatch’d.
Why worry? Condi is an expert in all things Russian. It’s in her resume’.
Power is no longer military, but resource based. Russia is a Resource Superpower that has leadership which understands its strengths and the western world weaknesses. It almost seems that Osama’s promise al-Qaeda would topple western economies is in line with present day Russia intentions. Could Osama and Putin be working together through back channels? Hasn’t Russia gained more from the total increase in commodities then any other country? Bush was/is the most narrowly focused America president I’ve experienced or studied. It seems that only one ball can be juggled at a time. Anything more overwhelms Bush’s brain.
Russia wants RESPECT and she will take it if it is not given.
I keep having visions of George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin sitting across from each other over a chess board…
Who would you bet on…?
Christ, this scares the crap out of me…
[quote comment="63431"]Power is no longer military, but resource based. Russia is a Resource Superpower that has leadership which understands its strengths and the western world weaknesses. It almost seems that Osama’s promise al-Qaeda would topple western economies is in line with present day Russia intentions. Could Osama and Putin be working together through back channels? Hasn’t Russia gained more from the total increase in commodities then any other country? Bush was/is the most narrowly focused America president I’ve experienced or studied. It seems that only one ball can be juggled at a time. Anything more overwhelms Bush’s brain.
Russia wants RESPECT and she will take it if it is not given.[/quote]
I think that’s a terrible oversimplification of Russia’s intentions. More generally, Russia is quite happy to work with any anti-US, anti-NATO or anti-Western group to protect Russian interests - Iran, North Korea, China and OPEC countries to profit from the oil situation. Russia is not so stupid as to work with overtly radical Muslims that might become a problem for Russia themselves - a large proportion of Russians are actually muslim, especially in problem regions like Chechnya. Not that they wouldn’t, but I’m pretty sure Osama has retreated from the Muslim extremist scene for some time, or at least Russia would never support him since there would be little to nothing to gain.
As for Bush, I don’t think he’s ever been capable of even one issue - even homeland security threats are mostly fictional or fictitious. The real threat to and problem for the US is ultimately itself.
Welcome back Mr. Regelbrugge! You are my favourite matthewgood.org contributor and this is a fine example why.
[quote comment="63480"][quote comment="63431"]
As for Bush, I don’t think he’s ever been capable of even one issue - even homeland security threats are mostly fictional or fictitious. The real threat to and problem for the US is ultimately itself.[/quote]
This made me think of a brilliant bit in the Tyee -
“The rigid adherence to ideology — any ideology — ultimately makes its adherents stupid. The neo-cons behind the Project for the New American Century — Dick Cheney and company’s blueprint for American global dominance — so fervently believed in their project that they dismissively rejected the conventional approach to foreign policy. The PNAC, by simply believing the U.S. had the right to police the world, assumed that it could. The resulting doctrine of “full-spectrum [military] dominance” over the entire planet was effectively immune to any real-world evidence to the contrary. In part because the PNAC brain trust and their president had contempt for the role of government, they simply bypassed the judgment of conventional state institutions and replaced reason with faith.
One Bush aide ridiculed what he called the “reality-based community” which consisted of people who naively “…believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” He told American writer Ronald Suskind: “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.”
Indeed they do. But it is looking less and less like the one their faith led them to imagine.”
Tyee Article
Of course Russia wants to live freely in peace and harmony, just like the U.S. It probably also wants to share that peace and harmony with the world, just like the U.S. (insert smirk here)
The truth is, U.S. is bordered by Canada (cheap cannabis) and Mexico (cheap labor). Sure, there is the communist Cuba. Russia is bordered by many smaller countries and requires careful monitoring of its borders. If you do extensive studies, you will find that terror acts, kidnappings etc are daily events all along Russia’s southern border. I find it interesting to watch the U.S. criticize other countries for their dealing in international politics considering its own history and that the most dangerous conflict the U.S. has ever been in with its closest neighbor is a verbal dispute over NAFTA (forgive me for ignoring Cuba).
But, truly, I can only think of
1. Putin’s followers being brainwashed into having many kids.
2. Rural areas that have all but died out - whenever I call my grandmother, it turns out that yet somebody 40 or younger has died (drunk driving, heart attack, liver failure…)
3. Many resources, but nothing is produced (except chocolate)
4. Girls running away to India/Middle East to “marry”
p.s. I would love to hear how interviews are interpreted - we, for the most part just laugh at them. And, yes, he does look like a pouting little boy.
If this does not scare the shit out of you then think about McCain and Pallin sitting across from Putin. Why do I keep thinking of that joke I used to hear around the arena all the time:
What is the difference between a pit bull and a hockey mom?
A: lipstick.
Nice joke, but - who’s got the balls?
Q: if they were to sit across from each other, who would blink first and why?
Actually, to re-iterate my earlier point, this is so PR and media driven, Wag the Dog scenario is like Tele-Tubbies. I am giving up on trying to understand what is the purpose - it is almost as if the current admin wants to do as much damage to the World as possible before they are out. Scared - no, dumbfounded - yes.