<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twenty Five Percent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/</link>
	<description>The home of musician Matthew Good</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: patrick bell</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68257</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68257</guid>
		<description>Just like to say that this post has generated some incredible discussion.  I've enjoyed reading all your takes on the current state of the natural world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like to say that this post has generated some incredible discussion.  I&#8217;ve enjoyed reading all your takes on the current state of the natural world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jclark</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68253</link>
		<dc:creator>jclark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68253</guid>
		<description>I think the irony here is that we're just emitting even more carbon dioxide debating the effects of humans on the planet.

Good thing we're all typing and not face to face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the irony here is that we&#8217;re just emitting even more carbon dioxide debating the effects of humans on the planet.</p>
<p>Good thing we&#8217;re all typing and not face to face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68251</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68251</guid>
		<description>@ Joseph M

I kind of doubt it's been people advocating for more equality and to have their voices heard that are behind all our problems. If not for the much more open cultural environment that has been created over the years it would be difficult to have an open debate about such important issues as Global Warming and habitate destruction. 

It's a sad fact that we still live in a world where a wealthy and powerful minority calls most of the shots. Stifling dissent would make it harder for positive change to occure, not easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Joseph M</p>
<p>I kind of doubt it&#8217;s been people advocating for more equality and to have their voices heard that are behind all our problems. If not for the much more open cultural environment that has been created over the years it would be difficult to have an open debate about such important issues as Global Warming and habitate destruction. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad fact that we still live in a world where a wealthy and powerful minority calls most of the shots. Stifling dissent would make it harder for positive change to occure, not easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vika</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68241</link>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68241</guid>
		<description>How can arms be used intelligently? Beyond hunting they have no logical use that would be good for us as a whole. Creation of bow and arrow really helped us out to get that precious fat and protein that was so beneficial for brain development. It also cut down on losses during the hunts. 

There is one use for arms though and it is relevant to the original discussion (we are underestimating its importance) - population control. If we were civilized enough not to use them against each other, think of what the population of the World would be now.

p.s. I am also quite sure that we tend to over-complicate things</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can arms be used intelligently? Beyond hunting they have no logical use that would be good for us as a whole. Creation of bow and arrow really helped us out to get that precious fat and protein that was so beneficial for brain development. It also cut down on losses during the hunts. </p>
<p>There is one use for arms though and it is relevant to the original discussion (we are underestimating its importance) - population control. If we were civilized enough not to use them against each other, think of what the population of the World would be now.</p>
<p>p.s. I am also quite sure that we tend to over-complicate things</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Shucraft</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68237</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Shucraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68237</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Unfortunately for the animals, they’re not civilized enough to take up arms and fight back. They can only do what is innate in them to do when we set up shop and go jogging in their back yard, case in point the rising number of ‘unprovoked’ bear attacks. And despite our human rationale, we do condemn them for it by shooting them in the head leaving their babies alone to die and featuring them on next week’s installment of “When Good Animals Go Bad”. Perhaps if the unprovoked attacks were for a good cause, like say oil, then it would be something worthy of our ‘human’ empathy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And at many times we have proven to not be civilized enough  when it comes to using them intelligently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Unfortunately for the animals, they’re not civilized enough to take up arms and fight back. They can only do what is innate in them to do when we set up shop and go jogging in their back yard, case in point the rising number of ‘unprovoked’ bear attacks. And despite our human rationale, we do condemn them for it by shooting them in the head leaving their babies alone to die and featuring them on next week’s installment of “When Good Animals Go Bad”. Perhaps if the unprovoked attacks were for a good cause, like say oil, then it would be something worthy of our ‘human’ empathy.</p></blockquote>
<p>And at many times we have proven to not be civilized enough  when it comes to using them intelligently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Smart</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68228</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68228</guid>
		<description>Joseph M:  It's like the gorilla said (and I'm paraphrasing here because I don't have the book with me) "I failed because I underestimated the complexity of what it was I was trying to teach"

Similarly, my grandfather used to say that, "sometimes we get so caught up in building the perfect fire engine that we don't notice the house burning down around us".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph M:  It&#8217;s like the gorilla said (and I&#8217;m paraphrasing here because I don&#8217;t have the book with me) &#8220;I failed because I underestimated the complexity of what it was I was trying to teach&#8221;</p>
<p>Similarly, my grandfather used to say that, &#8220;sometimes we get so caught up in building the perfect fire engine that we don&#8217;t notice the house burning down around us&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MStocker</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68226</link>
		<dc:creator>MStocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68226</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough, I stumbled across a wikipedia page last night about a novel called "The Green Brain" by Frank Herbert. In it, as humanity plunges further into the last refuges of natural space, some intelligent organism takes control of the remaining species and fights back.
It was published in 1966 (again, according to wikipedia).

So this morning, when I saw this post, I thought how funny and tragic. 
How prophetic too.

25% eh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough, I stumbled across a wikipedia page last night about a novel called &#8220;The Green Brain&#8221; by Frank Herbert. In it, as humanity plunges further into the last refuges of natural space, some intelligent organism takes control of the remaining species and fights back.<br />
It was published in 1966 (again, according to wikipedia).</p>
<p>So this morning, when I saw this post, I thought how funny and tragic.<br />
How prophetic too.</p>
<p>25% eh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vika</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68223</link>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 07:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68223</guid>
		<description>Satchboogieca,

I'm afraid that Entropy does not restore neutrality. Order is restored in one place while disorder reigns somewhere else to keep the balance in check - Second Law of Thermodynamics. I think this is why we cannot live in peace without an ongoing conflict :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satchboogieca,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid that Entropy does not restore neutrality. Order is restored in one place while disorder reigns somewhere else to keep the balance in check - Second Law of Thermodynamics. I think this is why we cannot live in peace without an ongoing conflict :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68215</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68215</guid>
		<description>CO2 emmission is a controversial topic currently, but people need to understand the scope of our activities. 

Volcanic activity is responsible for about 1 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere a year.

Humans activity puts about 40-50 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere a year. 

CO2 transmits visible light and absorbs infrared. Therefore sunlight passes through much of the CO2 in the atmosphere and hits the Earths surface where some is reflected, especailly from surfaces with a high albedo like ice and some is absorbed, especially with dark surfaces like the ocean. Some of this energy is retransmitted as infrared which the extra CO2 in the atmosphere captures, raising the overall heat capacity of the atmosphere.

And while CO2 isn't the major component in the greenhouse effect, water vapour is, it does help increase the amount of water vapour in the air by increasing evaporation. 

More CO2 = high temperatures = more water vapour = even higher temperatures. There's strong feedback in the system and we screw around with it at our our risk. 

On a lighter note here's a clip that is only tangentaly related to the environment, anyone who watched Hinterland Who's Who as a kid will love this ( if you're not too much of an arachnaphobe).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fzURXpftMo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CO2 emmission is a controversial topic currently, but people need to understand the scope of our activities. </p>
<p>Volcanic activity is responsible for about 1 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere a year.</p>
<p>Humans activity puts about 40-50 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere a year. </p>
<p>CO2 transmits visible light and absorbs infrared. Therefore sunlight passes through much of the CO2 in the atmosphere and hits the Earths surface where some is reflected, especailly from surfaces with a high albedo like ice and some is absorbed, especially with dark surfaces like the ocean. Some of this energy is retransmitted as infrared which the extra CO2 in the atmosphere captures, raising the overall heat capacity of the atmosphere.</p>
<p>And while CO2 isn&#8217;t the major component in the greenhouse effect, water vapour is, it does help increase the amount of water vapour in the air by increasing evaporation. </p>
<p>More CO2 = high temperatures = more water vapour = even higher temperatures. There&#8217;s strong feedback in the system and we screw around with it at our our risk. </p>
<p>On a lighter note here&#8217;s a clip that is only tangentaly related to the environment, anyone who watched Hinterland Who&#8217;s Who as a kid will love this ( if you&#8217;re not too much of an arachnaphobe).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fzURXpftMo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fzURXpftMo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick bell</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68212</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68212</guid>
		<description>Joseph...that is because we are individually intelligent and collectively stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph&#8230;that is because we are individually intelligent and collectively stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph M</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68209</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68209</guid>
		<description>I might post this again sometime seeing as it is at the bottom of a lot of comments and I believe it to be of vital importance.

This is a parable written by the most important author of our time, Daniel Quinn,


Sinking Ship

The ship was sinking---and sinking fast. The captain told the passengers and crew, "We've got to get the lifeboats in the water right away."
But the crew said, "First we have to end capitalist oppression of the working class. Then we'll take care of the lifeboats."

Then the women said, "First we want equal pay for equal work. The lifeboats can wait."

The racial minorities said, "First we need to end racial discrimination. Then seating in the lifeboats will be allotted fairly."

The captain said, "These are all important issues, but they won't matter a damn if we don't survive. We've got to lower the lifeboats right away!"

But the religionists said, "First we need to bring prayer back into the classroom. This is more important than lifeboats."

Then the pro-life contingent said, "First we must outlaw abortion. Fetuses have just as much right to be in those lifeboats as anyone else."

The right-to-choose contingent said, "First acknowledge our right to abortion, then we'll help with the lifeboats."

The socialists said, "First we must redistribute the wealth. Once that's done everyone will work equally hard at lowering the lifeboats."

The animal-rights activists said, "First we must end the use of animals in medical experiments. We can't let this be subordinated to lowering the lifeboats."

Finally the ship sank, and because none of the lifeboats had been lowered, everyone drowned.

The last thought of more than one of them was, "I never dreamed that solving humanity's problems would take so long---or that the ship would sink so SUDDENLY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might post this again sometime seeing as it is at the bottom of a lot of comments and I believe it to be of vital importance.</p>
<p>This is a parable written by the most important author of our time, Daniel Quinn,</p>
<p>Sinking Ship</p>
<p>The ship was sinking&#8212;and sinking fast. The captain told the passengers and crew, &#8220;We&#8217;ve got to get the lifeboats in the water right away.&#8221;<br />
But the crew said, &#8220;First we have to end capitalist oppression of the working class. Then we&#8217;ll take care of the lifeboats.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then the women said, &#8220;First we want equal pay for equal work. The lifeboats can wait.&#8221;</p>
<p>The racial minorities said, &#8220;First we need to end racial discrimination. Then seating in the lifeboats will be allotted fairly.&#8221;</p>
<p>The captain said, &#8220;These are all important issues, but they won&#8217;t matter a damn if we don&#8217;t survive. We&#8217;ve got to lower the lifeboats right away!&#8221;</p>
<p>But the religionists said, &#8220;First we need to bring prayer back into the classroom. This is more important than lifeboats.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then the pro-life contingent said, &#8220;First we must outlaw abortion. Fetuses have just as much right to be in those lifeboats as anyone else.&#8221;</p>
<p>The right-to-choose contingent said, &#8220;First acknowledge our right to abortion, then we&#8217;ll help with the lifeboats.&#8221;</p>
<p>The socialists said, &#8220;First we must redistribute the wealth. Once that&#8217;s done everyone will work equally hard at lowering the lifeboats.&#8221;</p>
<p>The animal-rights activists said, &#8220;First we must end the use of animals in medical experiments. We can&#8217;t let this be subordinated to lowering the lifeboats.&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally the ship sank, and because none of the lifeboats had been lowered, everyone drowned.</p>
<p>The last thought of more than one of them was, &#8220;I never dreamed that solving humanity&#8217;s problems would take so long&#8212;or that the ship would sink so SUDDENLY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salros</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68208</link>
		<dc:creator>Salros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68208</guid>
		<description>OK, Part 1 is Part 2 and you all can find Part 4 if you watch part 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Part 1 is Part 2 and you all can find Part 4 if you watch part 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salros</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68207</link>
		<dc:creator>Salros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68207</guid>
		<description>Looks like my first link did not script properly.

Part 1 &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkJUJ5-PL-0" rel="nofollow"&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like my first link did not script properly.</p>
<p>Part 1 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkJUJ5-PL-0" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salros</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68206</link>
		<dc:creator>Salros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68206</guid>
		<description>satchboogieca,

OK, I give on the CO2. But here are some links that you should view which show the scientific data used to make a similar conclusion.

Part 1  &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkJUJ5-PL-0" rel="nofollow"&gt;
Part 2  &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsDNmDyPLDk" rel="nofollow"&gt;
Part 3  &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZC4PR24BIc8" rel="nofollow"&gt;
Part 4  &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37SAFkvz6uY" rel="nofollow"&gt;

each video about 8-9 minutes.

Basic conclusion
Particle Pollution - high level but decreasing due to pollution devices.
Gases that cause a temperate capturing effect that cause increase temperature on the rise.

Particle Pollution causes dimming. Dimming effect is depleting fast due to our efficient control of particle pollution. 
Industrial, livestock gases increasing in density in our atmosphere causing an isolating effect capture heat. This effect in increasing rapidly.
Conclusion: Whatever change that may occur will happen at a much greater rate then most are predicting. Most likely within 50 years. Could be wrong but very interesting hypothesis.

Based on 40 years of data collected. Very important for all to understand. Knowledge will allow to prepare for unimaginable possibilities. Never say never. Remember 2 planes into two skyscrapers. Now our collasping financial system. I never could have imagine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>satchboogieca,</p>
<p>OK, I give on the CO2. But here are some links that you should view which show the scientific data used to make a similar conclusion.</p>
<p>Part 1  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkJUJ5-PL-0" rel="nofollow"><br />
Part 2  </a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsDNmDyPLDk" rel="nofollow"><br />
Part 3  </a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZC4PR24BIc8" rel="nofollow"><br />
Part 4  </a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37SAFkvz6uY" rel="nofollow"></p>
<p>each video about 8-9 minutes.</p>
<p>Basic conclusion<br />
Particle Pollution - high level but decreasing due to pollution devices.<br />
Gases that cause a temperate capturing effect that cause increase temperature on the rise.</p>
<p>Particle Pollution causes dimming. Dimming effect is depleting fast due to our efficient control of particle pollution.<br />
Industrial, livestock gases increasing in density in our atmosphere causing an isolating effect capture heat. This effect in increasing rapidly.<br />
Conclusion: Whatever change that may occur will happen at a much greater rate then most are predicting. Most likely within 50 years. Could be wrong but very interesting hypothesis.</p>
<p>Based on 40 years of data collected. Very important for all to understand. Knowledge will allow to prepare for unimaginable possibilities. Never say never. Remember 2 planes into two skyscrapers. Now our collasping financial system. I never could have imagine.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: satchboogieca</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68205</link>
		<dc:creator>satchboogieca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68205</guid>
		<description>Patrick Bell,

What will take down our numbers?

Pollution, cancer, AIDS, dramatic weather (storms), starvation, wars/genocide, etc..

That's pretty much what I can think of at this time.  Everything that has killed us before, though with the precursor to the Black Plague being extreme weather pattern changes, dramatic shifts, and the rats carrying disease... I suspect something like that will drop our numbers.  But I don't think the people were to blame for it, just one of those balancing things that happens.

I hope my death is quick and painless, and that's all I request.

Mother nature keeps things in balance, it is called Entropy.  Everything tries to get to a neutral state, from electrons in energy levels of atoms to gravity to heat transfer to osmosis.

It has happened before, though I don't think it was mother nature intentionally kicking Atlantian butt, the volcanic eruption destroyed what is believed to be Atlantis via a massive tidalwave.  I was watching A&#38;E/TLC/DISC and there was an awesome show explaining the technology Plato describes, found in ruins.  It was amazing, their walls were earthquake proof.  This is so cool I'm going to attempt to draw it with ASCII


_________________________________________________
---TOP-BEAM-OF-WOOD---------------------
__________________________________________________
---BLOCKS----&#124;B&#124;---BLOCKS---&#124;B&#124;---BLOCKS---
-------------&#124;E&#124;-------------&#124;E&#124;-------------
-------------&#124;A&#124;-------------&#124;A&#124;------------
-------------&#124;M&#124;-------------&#124;M&#124;-----------
//// repeat /// pattern

The Myan peoples suffered a similar fate.  It's amazing we've lasted as long as we have.

One thing I know, the rich will fight like hell to avoid being the ones to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick Bell,</p>
<p>What will take down our numbers?</p>
<p>Pollution, cancer, AIDS, dramatic weather (storms), starvation, wars/genocide, etc..</p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty much what I can think of at this time.  Everything that has killed us before, though with the precursor to the Black Plague being extreme weather pattern changes, dramatic shifts, and the rats carrying disease&#8230; I suspect something like that will drop our numbers.  But I don&#8217;t think the people were to blame for it, just one of those balancing things that happens.</p>
<p>I hope my death is quick and painless, and that&#8217;s all I request.</p>
<p>Mother nature keeps things in balance, it is called Entropy.  Everything tries to get to a neutral state, from electrons in energy levels of atoms to gravity to heat transfer to osmosis.</p>
<p>It has happened before, though I don&#8217;t think it was mother nature intentionally kicking Atlantian butt, the volcanic eruption destroyed what is believed to be Atlantis via a massive tidalwave.  I was watching A&amp;E/TLC/DISC and there was an awesome show explaining the technology Plato describes, found in ruins.  It was amazing, their walls were earthquake proof.  This is so cool I&#8217;m going to attempt to draw it with ASCII</p>
<p>_________________________________________________<br />
&#8212;TOP-BEAM-OF-WOOD&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
__________________________________________________<br />
&#8212;BLOCKS&#8212;-|B|&#8212;BLOCKS&#8212;|B|&#8212;BLOCKS&#8212;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-|E|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-|E|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-|A|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-|A|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-|M|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-|M|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
//// repeat /// pattern</p>
<p>The Myan peoples suffered a similar fate.  It&#8217;s amazing we&#8217;ve lasted as long as we have.</p>
<p>One thing I know, the rich will fight like hell to avoid being the ones to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick bell</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68195</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68195</guid>
		<description>Salros and Satch.  great argument...and both are very compelling.  I'm more in the Salros train of thought, however Satch brings up some great points.  Satch, I'll watch those links later...thanks.

Do we agree on this?  That all living things have a predator?  Or if they are plant-like they can be comsumed by another energy consumer?

If so, then Man being at the top of the food chain makes man it's own predator.  

All living things seem to have a way of balancing out without man's intervention right?  Eg. If there is an over population of deer in a certain area its because there isn't a large enough wolf population to keep the deer numbers down.  If the deer number are too high then they consume too much undergrowth, etc.  

What will take down man's population?  man right?  Unless there isn't an asteroid to hit earth....we'll slim the populous down via disease, mass crop failures and starvation which may be linked to environmental change...War on a very large scale....economics (depressions??)  just some ideas...thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salros and Satch.  great argument&#8230;and both are very compelling.  I&#8217;m more in the Salros train of thought, however Satch brings up some great points.  Satch, I&#8217;ll watch those links later&#8230;thanks.</p>
<p>Do we agree on this?  That all living things have a predator?  Or if they are plant-like they can be comsumed by another energy consumer?</p>
<p>If so, then Man being at the top of the food chain makes man it&#8217;s own predator.  </p>
<p>All living things seem to have a way of balancing out without man&#8217;s intervention right?  Eg. If there is an over population of deer in a certain area its because there isn&#8217;t a large enough wolf population to keep the deer numbers down.  If the deer number are too high then they consume too much undergrowth, etc.  </p>
<p>What will take down man&#8217;s population?  man right?  Unless there isn&#8217;t an asteroid to hit earth&#8230;.we&#8217;ll slim the populous down via disease, mass crop failures and starvation which may be linked to environmental change&#8230;War on a very large scale&#8230;.economics (depressions??)  just some ideas&#8230;thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vika</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68194</link>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68194</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;quoting Polarbear: 

To: Eric In Ottawa

There is a huge DNA bank called the Frozen Zoo for endangered animals. I think it is in Ca.&lt;/em&gt;

It is in San Diego. They currently have samples from about 800 species. Their website &lt;a href="http://cres.sandiegozoo.org/projects/gr_frozen_zoo.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;CRES Projects: The Frozen Zoo&lt;/a&gt; is definitely worth a look</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>quoting Polarbear: </p>
<p>To: Eric In Ottawa</p>
<p>There is a huge DNA bank called the Frozen Zoo for endangered animals. I think it is in Ca.</em></p>
<p>It is in San Diego. They currently have samples from about 800 species. Their website <a href="http://cres.sandiegozoo.org/projects/gr_frozen_zoo.html" rel="nofollow">CRES Projects: The Frozen Zoo</a> is definitely worth a look</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric in Ottawa</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68190</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric in Ottawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68190</guid>
		<description>Polarbear:

Thanks, that makes me feel a little better :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polarbear:</p>
<p>Thanks, that makes me feel a little better :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vika</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68159</link>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68159</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;One of the other things that may come from this revelation of the loss of 25% of the earth’s mammals is the possibility that this will allow for more invasive species. Over the last 500 years, roughly 50,000 species and variety of plants have been “introduced” in North America and it is estimated that the American economy now spends $138 billion per year dealing with invasive exotic species. Fewer mammals to regulate this could mean that these numbers will increase.&lt;/em&gt;

That also means possibility of introduction and spread of foreign diseases. Ball just keeps on rolling...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>One of the other things that may come from this revelation of the loss of 25% of the earth’s mammals is the possibility that this will allow for more invasive species. Over the last 500 years, roughly 50,000 species and variety of plants have been “introduced” in North America and it is estimated that the American economy now spends $138 billion per year dealing with invasive exotic species. Fewer mammals to regulate this could mean that these numbers will increase.</em></p>
<p>That also means possibility of introduction and spread of foreign diseases. Ball just keeps on rolling&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony1031</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgood.org/2008/10/twenty-five-percent/comment-page-2/#comment-68158</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony1031</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgood.org/?p=5029#comment-68158</guid>
		<description>That is shocking.

Although I was a little shocked as well to read the term 'population control' right underneath it. NOT a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is shocking.</p>
<p>Although I was a little shocked as well to read the term &#8216;population control&#8217; right underneath it. NOT a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
