Would You Like A Side Of Animal Cruelty With Your Order?

Wednesday, October 8th, 2008
I didn’t write this so stop fucking emailing me about it. -Matt.

Bacon


Eggs

Gandhi once said “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.”

A statement of wisdom from a wise man with whom I could not agree more…

And with that sentiment, I am going to ask that you join me in donating to and supporting California’s Prop 2 this November 4th… Prop 2 is a modest measure that stops cruel and inhumane treatment of animals, ending the practice of cramming farm animals into cages so small the animals can’t even turn around, lie down or extend their limbs. As far as I am concerned Prop 2 doesn’t do enough, but it is a start in the right direction…

Support Prop 2

Now I realize that most of you aren’t Californians… many of you aren’t even Americans… so why should you help me in supporting this bill?

California is essentially the cultural capital of the world… and yes, I know… there is much bad that can be said about that… but also much good… I dare anyone to argue that film, music and television haven’t had a positive effect in terms of shifting progressive and tolerant cultural ideas on race, gender, sexuality, and politics… so let’s make it culturally UNACCEPTABLE to support factory farming…

I eat meat.

Every day.

I enjoy grilling steaks, brats, ribs… I love bacon… and burgers… and a good beef stew… and fried chicken too… I am a foodie and I have the sumptuous waistline to prove it… based upon my impressive corpulence, in Victorian times I would have been considered a very wealthy man… (burp… rubbing belly…)

But lately the enjoyment of my culinary pleasures has been associated with much guilt… Yeah, I get the graphic e-mails from PETA and the Humane Society… you know the ones… I try to ignore them… to pretend they aren’t there… I’d even argue with myself that the horrible factory farms, the shit caked cages, the slaughterhouses thick with gore and terror were all just a few extreme cases of animal abuse…

I was dead wrong.

This is the NORM.

If you don’t believe me go visit a typical turkey farm, where the birds are cramped in dark hangars by the thousands… or a stinking abattoir staffed by illegals because no legal worker will put up with the rank and fetid conditions… or pig farms, with the lakes of toxic sewage fouling the ground water and neighboring rivers..

I spent my teenage years in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan (think of it as Canada without the social safety net) living and working among family farms and farmers… I was a 4H kid… the chickens ran free, the piggies played in the mud, and the cows munched in fields of alfalfa… and yes… we ended up eating all of them, but at least they had full happy lives… and at least to my knowledge, they were slaughtered humanely as well…

I’ve gone deer hunting… I love to fish… I believe that we humans are natural carnivores… Hunters and gatherers… But I also believe that we have a moral duty to be humane and that we shouldn’t be putting food on our table that has been tortured to death.

I’ll pay more for meat and eat less of it if that is what it takes… We North Americans eat way too much meat as it is… It is bad for the environment and takes up far too much land and resources which could be put to better use…

The horrible conditions in which we raise the food we put on our table is endemic to our society… a society in which there is little regard for anything other than how to turn a fast buck… we don’t seem to care about the fact that much of what we eat has been pumped full of steroids and antibiotics and raised in conditions so bad that Guantanamo Prison looks like the French Riviera in comparison… then in a final black celebration of our blatant disregard to the life we are about to vanquish, we slaughter the terrified animal it in the most callous manner feasible…

We eat the insane, the crippled, the sick… and what does that in turn make us? What do you think happens when you repeatedly ingest tormented flesh? We essentially become what we eat…

Just because we were given dominion doesn’t mean we should be dominionists… But seeing as we may be getting a vice president who considers shooting wolves from helicopters a pleasant sporting activity, I see this as a long uphill battle…

If you can, please donate… or at least help get the word out…

Support Prop 2

Stop The Show, Vote

Sunday, October 5th, 2008

There are no successful arguments for not voting in a democracy. Voting is not a privilege, it’s a right in our country, and one that needs to be exercised to be meaningful. If you don’t vote don’t give me some comeuppance excuse for not doing so. Admit to yourself that your laziness and/or your apathy are to blame. Admit that if conditions worsened in your own backyard you might be compelled to vote, but you’re likely in a cushy enough position with little to nothing directly or immediately at stake to cause you to get off your ass, walk a few blocks, take a bus, or drive to a polling station and take 28 minutes out of every 4 or less years or your life to write an ‘X’ on a piece of paper.

Voting matters, but not for the typical cliché reasons you might presume I’ll implore.

I vote not because I think things wil be better if x or y party are elected, but because they’re worse if I don’t vote, as a matter of the fact of political inaction and its affects demonstrated over the course of history.

I vote not because I think that it’s something that I should do, but because it’s something I want to do. I want to be heard. I want to be that one more vote cast and counted, I want to say to myself and others that I belong in this society, no matter how corrupt, fucked up, or estranged things may get within it. I’m as much responsible for how things are as you are.

There are no successful arguments for not voting in a democracy. The freedom in our democracy does not afford you the right not to vote, it simply does not condemn you for not doing so. Have you ever wondered why? Perhaps if you do a little thinking you’ll come to see that there are those who hold keys and hide behind the doors they lock who are fucking glad you don’t, because if you did, it would stop the show they’ve got going.

Young Canadians Promote Voting

Sunday, October 5th, 2008

I was forwarded some information regarding perfectthewayweare.ca which I thought impressive.

From the press release:

October 14th may be the most discussed election date in recent memory; individuals’ voices—and votes—have never mattered more. Perfectthewayweare.ca, an online resource website and video, was created by a group of young Canadians who want to draw attention to some of the major issues Canada is facing right now. They launched this viral movement to ensure that all Canadians are informed on the positions of each party and have the resources available to them to make an educated vote on Election Day.

Perfectthewayweare.ca is a project by a group of Vancouver Film School graduates and faculty. The designers and artists hope to change the minds of those who believe that young voters are a generation apathetic to politics. This collaboration was developed in the belief that our enthusiasm might provide a spark for others who may be hesitant to speak up because they feel their voice won’t be heard.

The issues highlighted in the video and online (Arts & Culture, Afghanistan, Health Care, Education, and Environmental Issues) are more complex than they seem. These tools have been created as a starting point to generate conversation between all Canadians, no matter where they live. Our role as Canadian citizens in the process has only begun, and we as Canadians need to make our voices heard on October 14th.

Morgan Jeske, spokesperson for the group, commented: “We’re not trying to encourage people to vote for any particular party, we just want people who care about Canada’s future to think about the issues that affect our lives.” He added, “We want to provoke people to research their choice at the polls and think in regard of the issues that are shaping our country and that are important to us.”

Join the conversation; make your voice known. And get out and vote on October 14th.

Vancouver Local: Free Forum Features Candidates In Discussion On Mental Health & Social Justice

Saturday, October 4th, 2008

The Adler School of Professional Psychology in downtown Vancouver is hosting a forum on mental health and social justice.

Admission is free to all, and the hall has 250+ seats.

“[This is] an opportunity for candidates to present their positions on or plans to address social issues and inequities that affect individual and community health.

Inequality exists in Vancouver today and has a major impact on mental health of individuals in our community. This forum is intended for students, counsellors and other health professionals concerned about the impact of social inequites on members of our society. Please join us as we hear from candidates from the major political parties in the Vancouver area discussing how their parties address these issues facing our community.”

To find out more, visit the Adler’s events page here.

(hat tip to Dave Lindskoog for sending along the PDF!)

5 Around The Table: English Leader’s Debate

Thursday, October 2nd, 2008


A wildly different format from year’s past, last night’s English Leader’s Debate was a madly paced display of more natural, un-rehearsed political jousting than I’ve seen in a long time.

The debate was moderated by Steve Paikin, The Agenda host and TVOntario’s popular bi-partisan politico, whom I thought did an absolutely stunning job at moderating fiery discussion smoothly. He interjected, re-focused, and retained the composure and civilty of the debate as often as meed be while also allowing party leaders to finish sentences, something I think important regardless of time limits.

In fact the entire discourse of the debate was overall excellent, with Leaders often delivering talking points which stretched any notion of planned punches and demonstrated how they respond when put to the test of live discussion on important topics like Canada’s involvement in Afghanistan, the economic outlook of the country, and our environmental track record and future. The debate in general is something that I as a Canadian am proud of. It’s my personal opinion that Mr. Paikin be given more National recognition for his bi-partisan contributions to invigorating Canadian democratic political involvement.

One must look to other examples, for instance the U.S. Joe Biden & Sarah Palin debate in democratic Nations to see just how real, unfiltered, and differently opinionated our political parties’ views are (at least as spoken of within the context of this debate).

There were several key presence markers made in the debate by all leaders, and no single party leader can be said to have “won” or “lost” during the night’s proceedings.

Perhaps the most compelling presence was that of Elizabeth May, Green party leader. Elizabeth was “voted” into the debate by Canadians all across the country who made it clear they wanted to hear from her and her party in these debates.

She came across as being extremely knowledgeable, demonstrating she’d done her homework on each of the parties’ track records, promises, and policy efforts. Most impressively, she articulated well the ways in which their foreign policies have affected the way Canada is active abroad— something which any political candidate need demonstrate if they are to represent us in the global scene, in my opinion.

She delivered to Canadians perhaps the most important message she needed to make by responding to the different topics presented quite adequately: We’re not a one-issue party, and we have a vision of Canada for the future at home, and in the world’s eyes.

Stéphane Dion’s Liberals had perhaps the most to gain in this debate, as they continue to try (in such a short period of time) to build and present a new identity in this election campaign.

Dion mostly focused on delivering information about the Liberal’s biggest platform policy initiative (The Green Shift) since Jean Chretien delivered his 1993 Red Book— at the time it was exceptional in how specific it was; while platforms before and since have contained a few substantive promises and many vague statements of principle, that Red Book laid out a long list of changes that the Liberals would make if brought to power.

For Dion, the Green Shift represents an optimistic outlook for a Canada which tempers economically progressive attitudes with environmentally sustainable clauses. For those who’ll take the time to read it, it does, in no short order, lay out a specific set of goals and timelines for achieving its aims.

He often presented himself as a Humanist, and deflected attention from past Liberal broken promises to his “new party vision”, while also successfully avoiding any mention of the fiscal scandal the previous majority Liberals endured.

Jack Layton, NDP party leader, made some sharp points and perhaps won the “best line of the night” nod for his call out to Stephen Harper regarding the lack of a Conservative platform this far into the election campaign. “Where’s the plan, under your sweater?” Layton quipped, a reference to the Conservatives plan to have Stephen Harper wear cardigan sweaters in its ad campaigns to “soften” his image.

Layton repeatedly (and unsurprisingly) hammered Harper regarding the tax cuts he built into his budget this year which included 50 billion dollars for companies as part of a package which also included cuts for small businesses & families. Perhaps Layton’s biggest miss in all the verbal assault was his real lack of demonstrating what policies the NDP are putting forward in any real depth.

Gilles Duceppe, leader of the Bloc Quebecois and the most seasoned debater present, took the opportunity as a chance to “Bloc” any advancement of the Conservative seat growth in Quebec from the last election, while for the most part declining to attack any other leader at the table at length. Most notably he sharply pointed to the Conservatives’ steep cuts for arts funding, claiming that in Quebec arts and culture represent the “soul of a nation”.

Stephen Harper clearly had the most to lose in the debate, and also had the unenviable position of the incumbent, as several questions posed by Paikin (sent in by Canadians across the country prior to the debate, and decided by the collected weight of topic) were quickly derided and became a swarm of criticism for Harper and the Conservatives on their policies and positions for hot button issues like Afghanistan, the environment, and Health Care.

Harper, though appearing his usual calm under intense pressure, buckled occasionally and demonstrated dismissive body language and condescending facial gestures while listening to the other candidates. He also repeated the cliché “Let’s be clear” over 30 times throughout the debate, and often spoke to his parties past actions, almost always avoiding any questions regarding what his party proposes to do if elected on October 14th.

The candidates echoed each other in slamming the Harper Conservatives for a missing platform, something I myself think a little ludicrous of the former party in power not long ago, having dissolved parliament themselves for this election.

Harper tried to paint the Liberal platform as fiscally imprudent, and hiding tax-increases. Dion consistently denied these allegations, and outright called Harper a liar for it. In all fairness to Dion, the Tories have cash-starved this election by design: Last fall they used up most of the surplus on $14.7-billion of annual tax cuts. It was a move designed to deny opposition parties fiscal room with which to plan campaign promises for a possible 2008 election.

Though there was no clear “winner” in my opinion, there will be gains made by both the Greens (I predict a 15% popular vote in this election for the Greens, a significant gain for them) and the Liberals (there will not be a Conservative majority, and the Liberals will gain back some of the ridings they lost to the NDP and the Conservatives last time round).

We have here in Canada a healthy political spectrum with parties that attempt to speak to and for Canadians about the issues they think we care about. But no leader or party can speak for us without individual Canadians speaking up for ourselves in our democracy and letting our MP’s and elected federal representatives know exactly what issue we care about.

In the context of participation, voting is a small part of a healthy democracy, and the real debates that are important to us all are the ones we share with each other— at dinner tables, in classrooms, boardrooms, bedrooms, and even those we have with ourselves when we consider political choices.

Regardless your party choice for this year’s election, make it an informed one.

Party websites & Links:
Conservative Party
Liberal Party
Green Party
New Democratic Party
Bloc Quebecois

The Agenda with Steve Paikin Podcast (RSS)
CBC Canada Votes Site
Globe and Mail National Politics

In Addition

…errata/content added after publication
Wording edits were made to the article @ 9:25am and 9:33am (PST) on October 3rd.
Full video of the debate (courtesy of the CBC) can be found here.

Twitting The 2008 Vice Presidential Debate

Thursday, October 2nd, 2008

The debate between Senator Joe Biden (D) and Governor Sarah Palin (R) was moderated by Gwen Ifill of PBS.

Thanks to everyone that followed along. You can look back through our Twitter archives to view Tweets made during the debate by visiting the official matthewgood.org Twitter page.

Live At Massey Hall Sneak Preview (Updated)

Wednesday, October 1st, 2008
If you visit the official Myspace page, the live version of Weapon has been posted.

Also, we’ve swapped a few songs in the player.

We’ve posted a small player to the website which previews a few tracks from the forthcoming October 7th release of Matthew Good: Live at Massey Hall.

You can access the player by clicking on the “Sneak Preview Tracks” link just below the black advertisment for the record on the home page, or by visiting the album’s page and clicking on the same “Sneak Preview Tracks” link.

We’ll be swapping a few different songs in the preview over the week leading up to the release Tuesday on iTunes.

Enjoy.

If you have trouble finding the link, you can open the player here. You’ll need the latest version of flash installed to hear it.

Money And Wealth 4: Racing Yachts Versus Life Boats

Monday, September 29th, 2008

Fun day in the beautiful city of Toronto. There’s a 30% chance of precipitation and brokers falling on Bay Street.

But you’re doing good, because you came here.

So by now you’ve resolved yourself to answering the 8 questions, making a small sacrifice today for a large deferred benefit tomorrow and you’re convinced of the magic of compound interest.

If you need a refresher see the below links.

Part 1: 8 Questions

Part 2: Promises And A Plan

Part 3: Acorns To Oaktrees

So where do you put your money?

How’s your mattress? The swear jar? The piggy bank? Joe Pesci?

There are 2 of 3 characteristics one should look for in an investment if one is to hope to make some decent growth.

It’s hard given the hyperbole of what we see in the headlines to trust any investment at all. But remember - media outlets need to sell the products displayed during the commercials, and fear is a great way to get peoples’ attention. (See Sept 11th/WMDs/Anathrax etc.)

So lets ignore the headlines and go back to the 3 characteristics that make up a person that will see value in what I have to write here.

1. Someone who makes decisions on fact and reason, and not emotion.
2. A responsible and loving family member or business person.
3. Someone with potential for growth.

Here’s a few historical facts for you.

Fact: The S & P 500 (a stock index) and the TSX have averaged returns anywhere from 10-15 % over 30 years every 30 years terms since 1932!

So while today is being compared to the Great Depression by CNN let’s not all go setting ourselves on fire and throwing ourselves out of windows based on soy bean futures.

Fact: After the Korean War the S&P 500 dropped 15% in 5 weeks. Six months later it was up 31%, and 36% a year later.
After sputnik in October 1957 the S&P dropped 10% in 3 weeks and was up 8% 5 weeks later & 30% a year later.
After the Nixon resignation it was down 19% but up 30% 5 weeks later and 27% a year later.
After the interest rate rise in Sept 1981 it was down 13% in 4 weeks but up 8% in a month and another 12% a year later.
Iraq invades Kuwait in 1990 and the market drops 20%! HOLY COW! (It’s up 28% 6 months later and 30% a year later.)
SEPTEMBER 11! Markets drop 12% in only 2 weeks. Up 19% 6 weeks later.
The war in Iraq in March 2003, the S & P 500 drops 3% in just over a week and a half, but recovers 19% in a month and 27% a year later.

There are more examples but the point should be clear.

If history has taught us anything about a bundle of companies it’s that they will go down, but they go back up, and on the long term, they continue to go up more than they go down.

The operative words being: A bundle of companies.

The 3 characteristics of a good investment are that it has a long time horizon, that it benefits from compound interest, and tax efficiency (not to be confused with a tax shelter).

There are a number of investments in Canada that have at least 2 of the 3 characteristics. I can only think of two that have all 3 though.

When one is looking for financial security one has to weigh the risk against the reward. The greater the risk, the greater the reward. So it stands to reason that one should look to get a great reward by mitigating the risk.

A longer time horizon does this.

While many banks will argue the merit of bonds, Guaranteed Investment Certificates (GIC’s), or high interest savings accounts with regards to low risk, I question the validity of the low growth of such investments as it relates to the investor.

If you figure that a decent GIC might, if you’re lucky, net you 4.5% over a 3 or 4 or 5 year maturity date you should consider the following:

What is the inflation rate at? (I believe in Canada it is currently sitting around 3.5%, so there goes a chunk of the value of the interest you make on your money.)

What is your marginal tax rate? Because 100% of the interest you earn on non-registered GIC’s, bonds, mortgage funds, treasury bills and savings accounts is taxable as income. So of the 1% you made after inflation you might take home .6% in today’s dollars.

I believe that an investor using common sense can do better. I’m with Dave Chilton of the Wealthy Barber that when your time horizon is 10 years or greater, that mutual funds consisting of equities subject to growth in the form of capital gains is a good choice.

A description of an early British fund, The Foreign and Colonial Trust, notes that it provides, “the investor of moderate means with the same advantages as the large capitalist, in diminishing in the risk of investing, by spreading the investment over a number of different stocks.”

Here’s why they are attractive to investors.

1. Professional Management: Investors pool their money to invest in a portfolio of securities run by a professional manager. These individuals must meet high standard of education and experience before they can be registered by provincial regulators as portfolio managers. So instead of you and your magic 8 ball trying to figure out which stocks to invest in, some trained individual will do it for you.

2. Diversification and Affordability: Majority of funds sold today are open-ended. So instead of buying open-ended funds on a stock exchange, investors deal directly with the fund company. If you want to buy new units in a fund, new units are created, there is no fixed amount or allowance. You can have a bit of precious metals, a bit of Canadian Natural Resources, and a bit of the banks, all in your small $25 dollar monthly contribution. Instant diversification.

Why do you want to do that? So that when one company goes tits up as we’ve seen many do, and the other companies benefit from that, you have minimal exposure to the one that went sour - and exposure to others that benefit. Ergo, you don’t have to worry about timing the market (buying low and selling high) and freaking out on Bay St.

3. Flexibility: There are many a category of fund on the market with banks and financial institutions today. There’s Asian Market funds, there’s real estate funds, there’s precious metal funds, there’s Canadian resource funds and many many more.

There’s even Ethical funds! Ethical Funds offer the most comprehensive line-up of socially responsible investments incorporating all major asset classes: Canadian income, balanced, Canadian equity, and foreign equity. You can literally invest in a number of companies that focus on promoting the environment.

So no need to sell out to the man.

Mutual funds are also transferable. So when you don’t like where you are, you can transfer your holdings at minimal, if any cost, to you the investor.

Lastly the income choice of how your fund grows is up to you by category. If you have a conservative fund that earns interest, as with the GIC’s much of that interest will be taxed to you as 100% income. But you could find funds that earn growth through capital gains (so only 50% of the growth is taxed to you as income) or in the form of dividends which in Canada are subject to favourable dividend tax credits.

4. Liquidity: With a few exceptions, most mutual funds can be quickly purchased and redeemed.

5. Investor Protection: While not protected by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) the way bank deposits are, mutual funds are protected by securities law, independent auditors, Canadian Investor Protection fund and Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada Investor Protection Corporation (IPC).

Mutual funds will not make anyone wealthy over night. However, a strategy that involves disciplined contributions over a long period of time to a professional managed bundle of diversified tax efficient equities will provide more security in the long term than many other types of investments available to the investor of modest means.

While not a perfect investment, putting away 10% of one’s income a month, into a well diversified fund of equity bearing investments over 10 years will provide some shelter from the markets on days like today, and substantial tax preferred growth.

For example: If you put away $100 a month into an aggressive portfolio, and we’ll assume it under performs the S & P 500 and only returns 8% in capital gains, well over 10 years indexed to todays inflation you’d have about $19,399. Over 20 years you’d have $64,123.

(Why 10 or 20 years? See the returns of the S & P 500 above over 10 year spans.)

If you put away $200 a month over 20 years and the markets perform as they always have - the earnings would be closer to $152,449.

Not bad, but that’s the magic of a small sacrifice subject to the magic of compound interest creating a large deferred benefit.

Be weary of those who promise “the perfect investment” or the “hot stock tip” or any investment that the bank says is “guaranteed”.

No investment is perfect; if one is hot one day it can be cold another; and finally if a bank ever says something is guaranteed, it’s worth asking who is it really guaranteed for?

I’ve mentioned the analogy before but it bears repeating.

The Titanic sank for 3 reason.

1. Class B metal was used instead of Class A on the spigots. Class A spigots would’ve kept the Titanic afloat 12 hours longer, more than long enough for Carpathia to arrive and save those left in the ocean.
2. Not enough life boats.
3. No binoculars in the crow’s nest.

I’m talking about life boats will keep you alive during a crisis, not racing yachts that perform for show when times are good but that sink during life’s storms.

The accomplished writer John Ruskin said, “Long after the sweetness of low price fades, the bitterness of poor quality lingers.”

This is very true when it comes to investing in your future. Choose quality that lasts over cheap promises.

So mutual funds, when employed properly, are a decent investment that holds 2 of the three characteristics that make for decent capital growth for one’s future.

That is, time, compound interest, and preferred tax treatment.

I said I know of only 2 investments that have all there of those characteristics.

The first one is your primary residence, the second will be for next time.

In the mean time, go set up your 10% pre-authorized chequing payment to a fund today at your bank or trusted financial institution. Make sure the money comes out on your pay day, that way it’s gone before you can spend it.

Pay yourself first, as Chilton would say.

See you later for Part 5, and enjoy the Thrillers better known as the headlines on CNN.

I Am Not Anti-American

Saturday, September 27th, 2008

… not even close. In fact I (and I would wager most Canadians) love the U.S., for so many reasons. In its history, The United States has produced many of the world’s foremost musicians, authors, poets, actors, playwrights, athletes, politicians, scientists, post-secondary schools, et al.

We as Canadians regularly enjoy the aforementioned for the fruits they bare in our lives everyday, in all aspects of our culture, whether we know it or not. So when I or any other Canadian write of the deeply flawed and troubled circumstances in which the United States finds themselves these days, we write because we’re frustrated, almost sublimely forlorn, for we know that this country to our south is capable of so much more, as it has demonstrated such in its past.

We long for America to find itself again as a nation, and move beyond its now antiquated notions of itself as simply the supreme power among the global politic, and deliver itself anew— rooted in principled execution of that strength and power, mobilized for progress by its vast demographic populace which wants, at its core, nothing more than to feel as significant in others’ eyes as it knows itself to be.

No, I am not anti-American, quite the opposite really— and I am willing to bet a great many other Canadians feel likewise. It’s for this reason that I concern myself with the future of our southernly neighbour, and recognize the deep connections we share on many levels which make its outcome as a nation interwoven with ours.

Though the outlook seems bleak for America, (and it will get worse before it’s possible for things to get better) I do believe that America will change. Yet no single politician, party, or group within the walls of its nation borders will accomplish this. No, it will arise when the United States makes “United” synonymous again with its core identity. Only then will things begin to turn around. Today, there are too many divisions that the United States concerns itself with, and propegates: Old/Young, Poor/Wealthy, Belief/Secular— the list goes on.

The outlook for America’s future will change when some of these tired dualisms dissolve, and the people of the United States of America are united not in fear, not in anger at a mutual enemy, but in the simple yet profound pride of community. It may sound trite and base, but it’s a simple truth which in all the complications that are spun around heads everyday, is just plainly overlooked. And that’s why Canadians like me up here like to postulate solutions for our neighbours— the other side of the fence offers perspective, right?

Sonny Parlin’s At It Again

Friday, September 26th, 2008

“Sonny’s wonderfully crafted, carefully thoughtless words”

Sonny Parlin, Thought Mechanics creator and MatthewGood.org contributor has started a new home for his political musings on the web, Not Pundit.

Filled with videos, small blurbs, images and quotes, Sonny’s NotPundit offers snapshots into the daily circus that is the U.S. political scene.

Take a minute and check it out, you’re gonna love it.

Sonny Parlin is a professional web developer from Connecticut, USA.
He specializes in building Web 2.0 applications

In Addition

…errata/content added after publication
It should be noted that Sonny has had nothing to do with the ‘Thought Mechanics’ website for some time now.