As you can see, we’ve become bored again and changed the design of the website. The impetus for the change was the confusion I felt existed with regards to the community menu, which is now located at the top of the page in an all inclusive, easy to locate box. That said, I just mock these things up in photoshop. Dale’s the one who actually turns my stick figure drawings into reality, so the entire credit rests with him to be honest. For years I have been strangely obsessed with the design of The Guardian’s Newsblog, so I suppose this is the closest that I’m going to get.
That said - something interesting from Basra. According to eye-witness accounts, the British air force has attacked an oil facility near the city (WMP Movie).
As many of you are aware, the US Embassy being constructed in Iraq is the largest of its kind in the world. What many of you might not know is how it’s been built. From the Asia Times…
“In the past few years there have been numerous stories about unscrupulous contractors hiring people from low-wage Asian countries such as the Philippines, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Pakistan for work in Iraq and then exploiting them with low pay, unsafe conditions, seized passports, cramped housing, and poor food, medical care and safety gear. But generally these were stories about people hired by private contractors working for other private corporations
But new accusations are changing that. Disturbing reports have surfaced about the nearly 900 laborers being used to build the new multimillion-dollar US Embassy in Baghdad and the conditions under which they work.
The accusations are rather ironic for the administration of US President George W Bush, as the they charge that workers are being treated as virtual slave laborers, a human-rights issue the administration has previously claimed it is dedicated to combating.”
You know, that’s about as realistic as me claiming that I’m ‘dedicated’ to safely sending Zebra’s to the moon to live in giant eco-domes. The solution, of course, is that those who have worked on the Embassy should, because of this, have their wages adjusted and be back-paid for their work at a fair rate. They should also be compensated for the conditions that they have been made to endure.
Will that happen? Of course not. Nor will the Kuwaiti company, the First Kuwaiti General Trading and Contracting Co that was contracted to build the Embassy, realistically be held accountable. Further quoting the Asian Times article…
“In fact, many observers wonder how FKTC got the $592-million contract in the first place. It was awarded to it by the US State Department in the summer of 2005. Many of its competitors, such as Framaco, Parsons, Fluor and the Sandi Group, which have established track records for building secure embassies or large-scale construction projects, were viewed as possessing far stronger experience. Many contractors believe that a high-level decision was made to favor a Kuwait-based firm in appreciation for that country’s support of the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
Investigations by the State Department’s inspector general and his counterpart in the US military in Iraq found no evidence of wrongdoing. However, the State Department inspector general, Howard Krongard, did acknowledge that recruiters in foreign countries may have misled potential workers about the pay and living conditions and said he had told the US Justice Department about the situation. The Justice Department has also launched a preliminary inquiry into these allegations, just to see if they warrant any further investigation.
But during testimony before the House of Representatives Oversight Committee last Thursday, Rory Mayberry, a former subcontract employee of the FKTC, said he believes that at least 52 Philippine nationals had been kidnapped to work on the embassy project…
“Mr Chairman, when the airplane took off and the captain announced that we were heading to Baghdad, all you-know-what broke out on the airplane. The men started shouting; it wasn’t until the security guy working for First Kuwaiti waved an MP5 [submachine-gun] in the air that the men settled down. They realized that they had no other choice but to go to Baghdad …
I’ve read the State Department inspector general’s report on the construction of the embassy. Mr Chairman, it’s not worth the paper it’s printed on. This is a cover-up and I’m glad that I’ve had the opportunity to set the record straight.
Let me spell it out clearly. I believe these men were kidnapped by First Kuwaiti to work on the US Embassy. They had no passports because they were confiscated at the Kuwait airport. When the airplane touched down at Baghdad airport, they were loaded into buses and taken away. Later, I found that they were being smuggled into the Green Zone. They had no IDs, no passports, nothing. They were being smuggled in past US security forces. I had a trailer all to myself in the Green Zone. But they were packed 25 to 30 in a trailer, and every day they went out to work on the construction of the embassy without the proper safety equipment.”
Personally, given the invasion and illegal occupation of Iraq, not to mention the lies that helped sell it to the American people, it only seems fitting that the US Embassy in Baghdad should been built on the backs of those kidnapped and forced to work in such conditions. Every American that steps foot it in should be ashamed, and Americans themselves should write Congress to demand answers as to why this was allowed to happen. Because the truth is, you don’t hire someone to construct something of that magnitude on your behalf and not know what is transpiring. Someone, somewhere, knew. They knew and said nothing. Thus is the reality of no-bid, politically motivated contracts.
This is, of course, not the first time that this subject has come to light. One wonders if, this time, it will melt away as quickly as it did the first.